首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE TO THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE
【24h】

THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE TO THE AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE

机译:欧洲司法法院对自由,安全和司法领域的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the European Court of Justice's (ECJ) past and present contribution- both procedurally and substantively-to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. While it is too early to speculate what the ECJ's contribution to this area will be under the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, the latter's modifications to the ECJ's jurisdiction merit close attention. After describing how the procedural limitations that were imposed on the ECJ's jurisdiction by ex Title IV of Part Three of the EC Treaty and by ex Title VI of the old EU Treaty have been almost entirely eliminated by the Treaty of Lisbon, this article posits that not only does the latter Treaty improve significantly the judicial protection of private individuals, but it also facilitates the dialogue between the Union and the national judiciaries in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Next, the article briefly explores the special ECJ procedures which may be followed in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in cases where time is of the essence. There, it is argued that, when having recourse to these procedures, the ECJ strives to strike the right balance between, on the one hand, swift judging and, on the other hand, the preservation of a qualitative and fair judicial procedure. As to substantive issues, drawing on examples from the fields of judicial cooperation in civil matters, asylum and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, it is argued that the ECJ's contribution to this area is largely grounded in the protection of fundamental rights. Finally, a brief conclusion supports the contention that the ECJ's contribution to the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice has favoured a 'mutual borrowing' of concepts and principles as between this area and other fields in relation to which the EU has competences, such as the internal market and competition. The Treaty of Lisbon having entered into force, an unprecedented level of coordination between different areas of EU law on both the procedural and substantive levels is to take place. Respect for fundamental rights will definitely be a unifying factor binding them all together.
机译:本文旨在概述欧洲法院过去和现在对自由,安全和司法领域的贡献,无论是程序上还是实质上。尽管根据2009年12月1日生效的《里斯本条约》的规定推测欧洲法院对这一领域的贡献为时过早,但值得密切注意的是后者对欧洲法院管辖权的修改。在描述了《里斯本条约》几乎完全消除了《欧共体条约》第三部分前四标题和旧《欧盟条约》前六标题对欧洲法院管辖权的程序限制之后,本文断言并非后一项条约不仅大大改善了对私人的司法保护,而且还促进了联盟与自由,安全和司法领域的国家司法机构之间的对话。接下来,本文简要探讨了在时间紧迫的情况下在自由,安全和司法领域可以遵循的特殊欧洲法院程序。有人认为,欧洲法院在诉诸这些程序时,力求在一方面迅速作出判决,另一方面又保持定性和公正的司法程序之间取得适当的平衡。关于实质性问题,有人从民事事务中的司法合作,庇护和刑事事务中的司法合作等领域汲取了实例,认为欧洲法院对这一领域的贡献主要是基于对基本权利的保护。最后,一个简短的结论支持了这样一个论点,即欧洲法院对自由,安全和司法领域的贡献促进了该领域与欧盟具有竞争力的其他领域之间的概念和原则的“相互借鉴”。内部市场和竞争。 《里斯本条约》已经生效,欧盟法律的不同领域在程序和实质层面上都将达到前所未有的协调水平。尊重基本权利无疑将是将所有基本权利结合在一起的统一因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号