首页> 外文期刊>Intensive and critical care nursing >An evaluation of the evidence base related to critical care outreach teams--2 years on from Comprehensive Critical Care.
【24h】

An evaluation of the evidence base related to critical care outreach teams--2 years on from Comprehensive Critical Care.

机译:从综合重症监护开始,对与重症监护外展团队相关的证据基础进行评估(-2年)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is now 2 years since the publication of Department of Health [Comprehensive Critical Care: A Review of Adult Critical Care Services (2000a)] document 'Comprehensive Critical Care'. One of its' main recommendations was the introduction of critical care outreach services. Many hospitals have since established such services and are providing education for ward nurses and house officers, and follow-up for patients discharged from intensive care when they return to a general ward. Early Warning Scoring (EWS) systems have also been introduced onto the wards to improve the identification of patients deteriorating into critical illness. However, as yet there appears to be little evidence that this investment has been worthwhile in terms of improving patient outcomes, such as reduction in cardiac arrests on the wards, reduction in unplanned admissions to critical care or earlier referrals to critical care. With many outreach teams hoping to expand their services in the future there is a pressing need to demonstrate an impact. We must remember however that some outreach teams have only been in post for 12 months and so it may therefore be far too early to reliably demonstrate any effect.
机译:距卫生部[全面重症监护:成人重症监护服务回顾(2000a)]文件“全面重症监护”至今已两年。其主要建议之一是引入重症监护扩展服务。此后,许多医院都建立了这样的服务,并为病房护士和房屋管理员提供教育,并为重症监护病房的患者返回普通病房提供后续服务。病房还引入了预警评分(EWS)系统,以提高对恶化为重症患者的识别能力。但是,到目前为止,几乎没有证据表明这项投资在改善患者预后方面是值得的,例如减少病房的心脏骤停,减少计划外的重症监护或早期转诊重症监护。随着许多外展团队希望将来扩大服务范围,迫切需要证明其影响。但是,我们必须记住,一些外展团队只在岗12个月,因此,要可靠地证明任何效果可能为时过早。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号