首页> 外文学位 >Critical analysis and evaluation of Don Browning's method for pastoral care.
【24h】

Critical analysis and evaluation of Don Browning's method for pastoral care.

机译:批判性分析和评估唐·布朗宁的教牧方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation is to present a critical analysis of Don Browning's method of pastoral care and to evaluate the effectiveness of his method in retrieving theological foundations for pastoral care. Being aware of the contemporary pluralistic environment, Browning has tried to define an effective approach for pastoral care which is based on a critical dialogue between theological and secular sources. In particular, Browning's main concern is to establish, through his method, norms of action to counsel and care for people.;In this study, the writer specifically evaluates how Browning's method contributes, positively and/or negatively, in establishing theological grounds for pastoral care, focusing on his attitude toward pluralism, his emphasis on ethical norms and his concern for "public" theology.;In the process of this analysis, the writer presents Browning's three sources of information for pastoral care: the Judeo-Christian tradition, cultural information, and personal experience, and then investigates how he correlates these sources to establish ethical norms. To clarify Browning's theological position, his understanding of human nature is incorporated into this task. Additionally, the primary problem of pastoral care for Browning, that is, the lack of ethical norms is analyzed. Within the analysis, Browning's application of his method in the issue of homosexuality is illustrated and investigated. Based on the findings, the writer also examines whether Browning is a theologian or a psychologist or both, by undertaking an internal critique of his approach to pastoral care. The question is raised: Is Browning using psychology to determine a better understanding of faith (as a theologian) or is he using psychology as a tool to simply develop psychological insights (as a psychologist)?;Finally, Browning's philosophical basis and work, as a reflection of the tension between traditional Christian faith and psychological theory, is investigated by comparing Browning with Thomas Oden who focuses on the traditional Christian faith to approach the nature of pastoral care.
机译:本文的目的是对唐·布朗宁的教牧方法进行批判性分析,并评估他的方法在检索教牧学神学基础方面的有效性。意识到当今的多元化环境,布朗宁试图基于神学和世俗资源之间的批判性对话,确定一种有效的牧养方法。特别是,勃朗宁的主要关注点在于通过他的方法建立行为准则,以对人们进行咨询和关怀。在本研究中,作者特别评估了勃朗宁的方法如何为建立牧区的神学基础做出积极和/或消极的贡献。照顾,着重于他对多元主义的态度,他对伦理规范的重视以及对“公共”神学的关注。在此分析过程中,作者介绍了布朗宁关于牧养的三大信息来源:犹太-基督教传统,文化信息和个人经验,然后研究他如何关联这些来源以建立道德规范。为了阐明布朗宁的神学立场,将他对人性的理解纳入了这项任务。此外,分析了布朗宁教牧的主要问题,即缺乏道德规范。在分析中,对勃朗宁在同性恋问题上的应用进行了说明和研究。基于这些发现,作者还对布朗宁的教牧方式进行了内部评论,以考察布朗宁是神学家还是心理学家,或两者兼而有之。提出了一个问题:勃朗宁是使用心理学来确定对信仰的更好理解(作为神学家),还是他使用心理学作为简单地发展心理见解的工具(作为心理学家)?最后,勃朗宁的哲学基础和工作是通过比较布朗宁与托马斯·奥登(Thomas Oden),该书反映了传统基督教信仰和心理学理论之间的紧张关系,托马斯·奥登(Thomas Oden)着眼于传统基督教信仰以探讨牧养的性质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Park, No Kwon.;

  • 作者单位

    Drew University.;

  • 授予单位 Drew University.;
  • 学科 Theology.;Clergy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号