首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Quarterly. >'This is not a Bill to legalize looting': Wartime Regulation of Enemy-Owned Intellectual Property in Australia
【24h】

'This is not a Bill to legalize looting': Wartime Regulation of Enemy-Owned Intellectual Property in Australia

机译:“这不是使掠夺合法化的法案”:战时澳大利亚敌对知识产权法规

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

At the beginning of both the First and Second World Wars, the Australian Parliament passed a series of statutes establishing a system for the continued regulation of domestic, foreign and enemy-owned intellectual property (IP) rights. One element of this scheme was designed to allow the community to use enemy-owned IP, through a mechanism of avoidance or suspension of these rights in the First World War, or licensing in the Second World War, where such use was in the public interest. This article is the first exploration of this wartime management of enemy-owned IP and examines the usage of this system throughout both hostilities. The dual-conflict and dual-rights analysis presented here reveals much about the legal, practical and social realities of the scheme and broader issues for IP law more generally, including the inchoate application of the concept of the "public interest", a term proposed by the Australian Productivity Commission to be included in the current compulsory licensing provisions of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth).
机译:在第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战开始时,澳大利亚议会通过了一系列法规,建立了持续监管国内,外国和敌人拥有的知识产权(IP)的制度。该计划的一个要素旨在通过在第一次世界大战中避免或中止这些权利的机制,或者在第二次世界大战中出于公共利益的目的使用许可的机制,允许社区使用敌方拥有的IP 。本文是对敌方拥有的IP的战时管理的首次探索,并研究了在两种敌对行动中该系统的使用情况。本文介绍的双重冲突和双重权利分析揭示了该计划的法律,实践和社会现实,以及更广泛的知识产权法更广泛问题,其中包括对“公共利益”这一概念的早期应用。澳大利亚生产力委员会将其纳入1990年《专利法》(联邦)的现行强制许可条款中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号