首页> 外文期刊>Integrative cancer therapies >Survey of Policies and Guidelines on Antioxidant Use for Cancer Prevention, Treatment, and Survivorship in North American Cancer Centers: What Do Institutions Perceive as Evidence?
【24h】

Survey of Policies and Guidelines on Antioxidant Use for Cancer Prevention, Treatment, and Survivorship in North American Cancer Centers: What Do Institutions Perceive as Evidence?

机译:北美癌症中心关于抗氧化剂用于癌症预防,治疗和幸存的政策和指南的调查:机构认为什么证据?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Health care policies and guidelines that are clear and consistent with research evidence are important for maximizing clinical outcomes. To determine whether cancer centers in Canada and the United States had policies and/or guidelines about antioxidant use, and whether policies were aligned with the evidence base, we reviewed current research evidence in the field, and we undertook a survey of the policies and guidelines on antioxidant use at cancer institutions across North America. Methods. A survey of policies and guidelines on antioxidant use and the development and communication of the policies and guidelines was conducted by contacting cancer institutions in North America. We also conducted a Website search for each institution to explore any online resources. Results. Policies and guidelines on antioxidant use were collected from 78 cancer institutions. Few cancer institutions had policies (5%) but most provided guidelines (69%). Antioxidants from diet were generally encouraged at cancer institutions, consistent with the current research evidence. In contrast, specific antioxidant supplements were generally not recommended at cancer institutions. Policies and guidelines were developed using evidence-based methods (53%), by consulting another source (35%), or through discussions/conference (26%), and communicated mainly through online resources (65%) or written handouts (42%). For cancer institutions that had no policy or guideline on antioxidants, lack of information and lack of time were the most frequently cited reasons. Conclusions. Policies and guidelines on antioxidants from diet were largely consistent with the research evidence. Policies and guidelines on antioxidant supplements during treatment were generally more restrictive than the research evidence might suggest, perhaps due to the specificity of results and the inability to generalize findings across antioxidants, adding to the complexity of their optimal and safe use. Improved communication of comprehensive research evidence to cancer institutions may aid in the development of more evidence-based policies and guidelines.
机译:背景。清晰且与研究证据一致的卫生保健政策和指南对于最大化临床结果非常重要。为了确定加拿大和美国的癌症中心是否制定了有关抗氧化剂使用的政策和/或指南,以及政策是否与证据基础保持一致,我们审查了该领域的最新研究证据,并对政策和指南进行了调查。关于北美癌症机构抗氧化剂的使用。方法。通过与北美的癌症机构联系,对抗氧化剂使用的政策和指南以及政策和指南的制定和沟通进行了调查。我们还为每个机构进行了网站搜索,以探索任何在线资源。结果。从78个癌症机构收集了抗氧化剂使用的政策和指南。很少有癌症机构制定政策(5%),但大多数提供了指南(69%)。与当前的研究证据相一致,癌症机构普遍鼓励饮食中的抗氧化剂。相反,癌症机构通常不建议使用特定的抗氧化剂补充剂。使用循证方法(53%),咨询其他来源(35%)或通过讨论/会议(26%)制定政策和指南,主要通过在线资源(65%)或书面材料(42%)进行交流)。对于没有抗氧化剂政策或指南的癌症机构,缺乏信息和时间不足是最常被提及的原因。结论饮食中抗氧化剂的政策和指南与研究证据基本一致。关于治疗期间抗氧化剂补充剂的政策和指南通常比研究证据可能更具限制性,这可能是由于结果的特殊性以及无法对所有抗氧化剂的研究结果进行概括,从而增加了其最佳和安全使用的复杂性。与癌症机构更好地交流综合研究证据可能有助于制定更多基于证据的政策和指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号