首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Limited volume resuscitation in hypotensive elderly multiple trauma is safe and prevents early clinical dilutive coagulopathy - A matched pair analysis from TraumaRegister DGU~R
【24h】

Limited volume resuscitation in hypotensive elderly multiple trauma is safe and prevents early clinical dilutive coagulopathy - A matched pair analysis from TraumaRegister DGU~R

机译:在低血压老年人多发性创伤中进行有限量的复苏是安全的,并可预防早期的临床稀释性凝血病-TraumaRegister DGU〜R进行的配对分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The use of permissive hypotension includes a restrained volume preclinical therapy. However, in the elderly patients, this approach has raised concerns because of the increased cardiovascular risk profile and a higher incidence of hypertension under normal conditions. The aim of the study was to examine whether preclinical administration of restrictive volume therapy in the elderly patient can be safe.Patients and methods: A retrospective matched-pair analysis with the data set of the TraumaRegister DGU? (TR-DGU) was performed based on data of 176 pairs of totally 67,000 patients. To address elderly potentially bleeding patients without major brain injury the following inclusion criteria were chosen: patients > 60 years, ISS > 16, AIS head < 4, preclinical blood pressure between 60 and 100 mmHg and recorded preclinical volume administration. Patients that met the inclusion criteria (908) were divided into two groups: pre-clinical volume resuscitation <1000ml (=low volume) and >1000ml (high volume). Patients with high- and low-volume fluid replacement were matched according to the following criteria: age group, gender, date of the accident ±5 years, ISS, GCS, preclinical intubation, ground-/air-transport, pre-clinical blood pressure.Results: Preclinical volume resuscitation showed a difference of about 1000 ml between the "low volume" and "high volume" group. The "low volume" group showed a significantly elongated prothrombin time. The amount of blood products given in the emergency department was not significantly different. The ventilation was 2 days shorter in the "low volume", although the number of patients with severe thoracic trauma was greater in this group. The length of stay in the 1CU differed by 3 days in favour of the "low volume" group. The overall mortality was almost the same in both groups. Conclusions: Based on these data it can be assumed that the lower preclinical volume administration has a positive effect on the initial coagulation status in elderly patients. In spite of some limitations such as low number of matched pairs, we draw the cautious conclusion that a restrictive preclinical volume therapy is safe and also indicated in elderly patients.
机译:背景:允许性低血压的使用包括限制量的临床前治疗。但是,在老年患者中,这种方法引起了人们的关注,因为在正常情况下,心血管风险的增加和高血压的发病率更高。这项研究的目的是检查对老年患者进行限制性容量疗法的临床前给药是否安全。患者和方法:使用TraumaRegister DGU数据集进行回顾性配对分析? (TR-DGU)是根据176对患者总计67,000名患者的数据进行的。为了解决没有重大脑损伤的可能潜在出血的老年患者,选择了以下纳入标准:> 60岁,ISS> 16,AIS头<4,临床前血压在60至100 mmHg之间的患者,并记录临床前的剂量。符合入选标准(908)的患者分为两组:临床前容量复苏<1000ml(=低容量)和> 1000ml(高容量)。根据以下标准,对大容量和小容量液体补充剂的患者进行了匹配:年龄组,性别,事故发生日期±5年,ISS,GCS,临床前插管,地面/空气输送,临床前血压结果:临床前容量复苏显示“低容量”和“高容量”组之间的差异约为1000 ml。 “低剂量”组显示凝血酶原时间明显延长。急诊科提供的血液制品数量没有显着差异。 “低容量”通气时间缩短了2天,尽管该组患有严重胸外伤的患者人数较多。在1CU中的停留时间相差3天,以“低流量”组为好。两组的总死亡率几乎相同。结论:根据这些数据,可以假设较低的临床前剂量管理对老年患者的初始凝血状态具有积极影响。尽管存在一些局限性,例如匹配对数较少,但我们得出谨慎的结论,即限制性的临床前容量疗法是安全的,并且也适用于老年患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号