首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Haematology >Chelation treatment in sickle-cell-anaemia: much ado about nothing?
【24h】

Chelation treatment in sickle-cell-anaemia: much ado about nothing?

机译:镰状细胞贫血的螯合治疗:事不宜迟?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Blood transfusions may prevent and treat serious complications related to sickle-cell disease (SCD) when performed according to specific guidelines. However, blood transfusion requirements in SCD inevitably lead to increased body iron burden. An adequate chelation treatment may prevent complications and reduce morbidity and mortality. This review evaluates the effectiveness, safety and costs of chelation treatment. The included trials were examined according to the recommendations of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Overall, 14 trials and a total of 502 patients with SCD were included in this review. Deferoxamine alone (s.c. or i.v.), deferiprone alone or versus deferoxamine, deferasirox versus deferoxamine and combined treatment with deferoxamine plus deferiprone were included and evaluated in the analysis. Only two randomized clinical trials have been reported. The results of this analysis suggest that use of chelation treatment in SCD to date has been based on little efficacy and safety evidence, although it is widely recommended and practised. The cost/benefit ratio has not been fully explored. Further research with larger randomized clinical trials needs to be performed.
机译:根据特定指南进行输血可以预防和治疗与镰状细胞病(SCD)相关的严重并发症。但是,SCD中的输血需求不可避免地导致体内铁负荷增加。适当的螯合治疗可预防并发症并降低发病率和死亡率。该评价评估了螯合治疗的有效性,安全性和成本。根据美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(AHA)的建议对纳入的试验进行了检查。总体而言,该评价纳入了14个试验和总共502例SCD患者。包括单独的去铁胺(s.c.或i.v.),单独的去铁酮(或去铁胺),去铁胺或去铁胺,地拉罗司和去铁胺以及用去铁胺加去铁酮联合治疗,并在分析中进行评估。仅报道了两项随机临床试验。该分析的结果表明,尽管已被广泛推荐和实践,但迄今为止在SCD中使用螯合治疗的疗效和安全性证据均很少。成本/收益比尚未得到充分探讨。需要通过较大的随机临床试验进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号