...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain research bulletin >Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
【24h】

Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.

机译:视觉,触觉和听觉信号的三峰整合,可感知事件序列。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigated the interactions between visual, tactile and auditory sensory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Sequences of flashes, taps and beeps were presented simultaneously. For each session, subjects were instructed to count the number of events presented in one modality (Target) and to ignore the stimuli presented in the other modalities (Background). The number of events presented in the background sequence could differ from the number of events in the target sequence. For each session, we quantified the Background-evoked bias by comparing subjects' responses with and without Background (Target presented alone). Nine combinations between vision, touch and audition were tested. In each session but two, the Background significantly biased the Target. Vision was the most susceptible to Background-evoked bias and the least efficient in biasing the other two modalities. By contrast, audition was the least susceptible to Background-evoked bias and the most efficient in biasing the other two modalities. These differences were strongly correlated to the relative reliability of each modality. In line with this, the evoked biases were larger when the Background consisted of two instead of only one modality. These results show that for the perception of sequences of events: (1) vision, touch and audition are automatically integrated; (2) the respective contributions of the three modalities to the integrated percept differ; (3) the relative contribution of each modality depends on its relative reliability (1/variability); (4) task-irrelevant stimuli have more weight when presented in two rather than only one modality.
机译:我们研究了视觉,触觉和听觉感觉信号之间的相互作用,以感知事件序列。同时显示闪烁,轻击和蜂鸣声的顺序。对于每节课,指示对象计数一种方式(目标)中呈现的事件数,而忽略另一种方式(背景)中呈现的刺激。在后台序列中出现的事件数量可能与目标序列中的事件数量不同。对于每个环节,我们通过比较有无背景(目标单独提出)的受试者反应来量化背景引起的偏见。测试了视觉,触觉和听觉之间的九种组合。在每两次会议中,背景会议都大大偏离了目标。视觉最容易受到背景引起的偏见,而对其他两种方式的偏见效率最低。相比之下,试听最容易受到背景引起的偏见,并且在偏向其他两种方式时最有效。这些差异与每种方式的相对可靠性密切相关。与此相符,当背景由两个而不是仅一个模态组成时,引起的偏见更大。这些结果表明,对于事件序列的感知:(1)视觉,触觉和听觉是自动整合的; (2)三种方式对综合感知的贡献不同; (3)每个模态的相对贡献取决于其相对可靠性(1 /可变性); (4)与任务无关的刺激以两种形式呈现,而不是一种形式,具有更大的分量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号