首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >An Alternative to Formal Certification for Improving the Quality of Experiential Learning
【24h】

An Alternative to Formal Certification for Improving the Quality of Experiential Learning

机译:正式证书的替代品,可提高体验式学习的质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Byrne et al. (2014) make a compelling case for enhancing the education and training of industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology students as a means of making them more competitive in today's changing employment marketplace. This commentary addresses their recommendation that "SIOP urge I–O programs to require certified internships for practice-aimed students." Enhanced training has the potential to elevate the profession and strengthen the I–O brand; however, requiring certification is not only infeasible, it will very likely have several negative unintended consequences. This commentary explores the potential pitfalls of certification and offers an alternative approach to improving the quality of internships. I leave to others with more experience the topic of certifying postdocs, but many of these comments could potentially apply to these programs as well.
机译:伯恩等。 (2014)提出了一个令人信服的案例,以加强对工业组织(I–O)心理学学生的教育和培训,以此使他们在当今不断变化的就业市场中更具竞争力。该评论满足了他们的建议:“ SIOP敦促I-O计划要求以实践为导向的学生获得经过认证的实习机会。”加强培训有可能提升专业水平并增强I–O品牌;但是,要求认证不仅是不可行的,而且很可能会带来一些负面的意外后果。该评论探讨了认证的潜在陷阱,并提供了提高实习质量的另一种方法。我让更多有经验的人去谈论认证博士后的话题,但是其中许多评论也可能适用于这些程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号