...
首页> 外文期刊>Infection control and hospital epidemiology >What is the optimal period for measuring hand hygiene compliance: Are longer periods better than 20-minute periods?
【24h】

What is the optimal period for measuring hand hygiene compliance: Are longer periods better than 20-minute periods?

机译:衡量手部卫生状况的最佳时间是多少:更长的时间比20分钟的时间好吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Direct observation of hand hygiene is considered the gold standard for measuring healthcare worker (HCW) hand hygiene compliance (HHC) for clinical audit and hand hygiene intervention trials. Many studies and audits observe for 20-30 minutes, but systematic review shows that others observe for 1-4 hours or more, without explaining the rationale for this longer observation period.1 World Health Organization (WHO) guidance recommends observation for 20 minutes (with an additional 10 minutes of observation if necessary).2 HCW hand hygiene may improve when HCWs are aware of being observed,3 but it is unclear whether this reactivity increases or decreases over time or introduces systematic bias. Short periods of observation may not reflect 24-hour, 7-days-per-week behavior.3 In addition, short observation periods may not provide enough observations to meet previously identified criteria for interobserver reliability, because compliance levels differ between observers by over 10% if less than 15 hand hygiene moments are observed.
机译:直接观察手卫生被认为是衡量医疗保健人员(HCW)手卫生合规性(HHC)的金标准,用于临床审核和手卫生干预试验。许多研究和审计会观察20到30分钟,但系统评价显示,其他观察和观察要进行1-4个小时或更长时间,而没有解释这一较长观察期的理由。1世界卫生组织(WHO)指南建议观察20分钟(并在必要时再观察10分钟。)2当意识到自己被观察到时,医护人员的手部卫生状况可能会改善3,但尚不清楚这种反应性是否会随着时间的推移而增加或降低,或引入系统性偏见。短暂的观察可能无法反映每周7天,每天24小时的行为。3此外,短暂的观察可能无法提供足够的观察结果来满足先前确定的观察者之间可靠性的标准,因为观察者之间的依从性水平相差10倍以上少于15个手部卫生力矩的百分比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号