...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Hypertension >The dominant role of the systolic component of nondipping status on target-organ damage in never-treated hypertensives.
【24h】

The dominant role of the systolic component of nondipping status on target-organ damage in never-treated hypertensives.

机译:在未治疗的高血压患者中,非浸润状态的收缩期成分对靶器官损害的支配性作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) nondipping has been associated with target-organ damage (TOD) and adverse outcomes in hypertension. Diverse definitions of nondipping status appear in the literature, regarding the BP components taken into account. Aim of this study was to compare the effects of isolated nondipping of systolic, diastolic and combined systolic and diastolic BP on various indices of TOD. METHODS: From 630 consecutive subjects with never-treated essential hypertension stage I-II, we selected 279 subjects who were consistently isolated systolic nondippers (SND, n=76) isolated diastolic nondippers (DND, n=64) and combined systolic and diastolic nondippers (SDND, n=139) in two ambulatory BP monitoring sessions. All three subgroups were subjected to echocardiographic examination, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV(c-f)) and albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) determination. Metabolic profile was determined in a morning blood sample. RESULTS: SND compared to DND and SDND exhibited higher left ventricular mass/height(2.7) (42.4 +/- 9.9 vs. 38.0 +/- 9.1 vs. 40.9 +/- 11.0 g/m(2.7), P < 0.05), higher log(10)(PWV(c-f)) (0.94 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.86 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.07 m/s, P < 0.005), and higher log(10)(ACR) (1.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.4 mg/g, P < 0.05). Isolated systolic BP nondipping was an independent determinant of all the studied indices of TOD whereas isolated diastolic BP nondipping was not. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated systolic as compared to diastolic and to combined systolic/diastolic BP nondipping is associated with higher left ventricular mass, stiffer arteries, and pronounced urinary albumin excretion.
机译:背景:血压(BP)的不浸入与靶器官损害(TOD)和高血压的不良后果相关。关于非浸入状态的各种定义出现在有关考虑到的BP成分的文献中。这项研究的目的是比较收缩期,舒张期以及联合收缩期和舒张期BP的不浸润对TOD各项指标的影响。方法:从630名从未接受过原发性高血压I-II期治疗的连续受试者中,我们选择了279例一贯独立于收缩期非浸润性药物(SND,n = 76),独立舒张期非浸润性药物(DND,n = 64)以及合并了收缩期和舒张期非浸润性药物的受试者(SDND,n = 139)在两个动态BP监视会话中。对这三个亚组均进行了超声心动图检查,颈股动脉脉搏波速度(PWV(c-f))和白蛋白与肌酐比(ACR)的测定。在早晨的血液样本中确定代谢曲线。结果:与DND和SDND相比,SND表现出更高的左心室质量/高度(2.7)(42.4 +/- 9.9 vs.38.0 +/- 9.1 vs.40.9 +/- 11.0 g / m(2.7),P <0.05),更高的log(10)(PWV(cf))(0.94 +/- 0.07 vs.0.86 +/- 0.05 vs.0.91 +/- 0.07 m / s,P <0.005)和更高的log(10)(ACR)( 1.2 +/- 0.5对0.9 +/- 0.3对1.1 +/- 0.4 mg / g,P <0.05)。孤立的收缩压非浸润是TOD所有研究指标的独立决定因素,而孤立的舒张压非浸润并非如此。结论:与舒张压和收缩压/舒张压联合血压相比,孤立的收缩压与左心室质量增加,动脉僵硬和明显的尿白蛋白排泄有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号