首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Severe infections after unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults: comparison of cord blood transplantation with peripheral blood and bone marrow transplantation.
【24h】

Severe infections after unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults: comparison of cord blood transplantation with peripheral blood and bone marrow transplantation.

机译:成人无关供体同种异体造血干细胞移植后的严重感染:脐带血移植与外周血和骨髓移植的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We evaluated the occurrence of severe infections in 192 consecutive adult recipients of volunteer unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants, with a detailed analysis of severe infections after receipt of cord blood transplants (CBTs; n = 48) or bone marrow transplants (BMTs)/peripheral blood stem cell transplants (PBSCTs; n = 144). At a 3-year median follow-up, CBT recipients had a higher risk of developing any severe infection (85% versus 69% in BMT/PBSCT recipients, P < .01). CBT recipients had a higher incidence of severe bacterial infections before day +100, but at 3 years the risks of these and other infections were similar in the CBT and BMT/PBSCT groups. In addition, the 100-day and 3-year incidences of infection-related mortality (IRM) did not differ between groups (P = .2 and .5, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the most significant risk factor for IRM in all 192 patients was monocytopenia (.2 x 10(9)/L). In CBT recipients, only neutropenia (.2 x 10(9)/L) on day +30 and low nucleated cell dose infusion (< 2 x 10(7)/kg) showed a trend for increased IRM (P = .05 in both cases). Stem cell source had no effect on day +100 or 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM), cytomegalovirus infection, cytomegalovirus disease (7% versus 6%), or overall survival (36% versus 39%, respectively). The number of mismatches in HLA (A, B, and DRB1) had no effect on any outcome in CBT recipients. In contrast, in the BMT/PBSCT group, the presence of any mismatch by low or high-resolution HLA typing (A, B, C, and DRB1) increased NRM and decreased overall survival (P < .01). IRM was the primary or secondary cause of death in 61% and 59% of CBT and BMT/PBSCT recipients who died, respectively. Our results confirm the relevance of severe infectious complications as source of severe morbidity and NRM after volunteer unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults, but suggest that CBT recipients have a similar risk of dying from an infection if an accurate selection of a cord blood unit is done.
机译:我们评估了192名连续的成年自愿者无关供体同种异体造血干细胞移植的严重感染的发生率,并详细分析了接受脐血移植(CBTs; n = 48)或骨髓移植(BMTs)/后的严重感染外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT; n = 144)。在为期3年的中位随访中,CBT接受者发生任何严重感染的风险较高(85%,而BMT / PBSCT接受者为69%,P <.01)。 CBT接受者在+100天之前发生严重细菌感染的几率更高,但在3年时,CBT和BMT / PBSCT组的这些细菌感染和其他感染的风险相似。此外,两组之间感染相关死亡率(IRM)的100天和3年发生率没有差异(分别为P = 0.2和.5)。在多变量分析中,所有192例患者中IRM的最大危险因素是单血细胞减少症(.2 x 10(9)/ L)。在接受CBT的患者中,只有+30天的中性粒细胞减少(.2 x 10(9)/ L)和低核细胞剂量输注(<2 x 10(7)/ kg)表现出IRM增加的趋势(P = 0.05)两种情况)。干细胞来源对+100天或3年非复发死亡率(NRM),巨细胞病毒感染,巨细胞病毒疾病(分别为7%和6%)或总生存(分别为36%和39%)没有影响。 HLA(A,B和DRB1)的错配数目对CBT接受者的任何结局均没有影响。相反,在BMT / PBSCT组中,通过低分辨率或高分辨率HLA分型(A,B,C和DRB1)出现的任何不匹配都会增加NRM并降低总体生存率(P <0.01)。 IRM是分别导致死亡的61%和59%的CBT和BMT / PBSCT接受者的主要或次要死亡原因。我们的研究结果证实,成人自愿性无关供体造血干细胞移植后,严重的感染并发症是严重的发病率和NRM的来源,但是如果正确选择脐带血单位,则表明CBT接受者死于感染的风险相似。已经完成了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号