...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology >Comparative efficacy and safety of topical permethrin, topical ivermectin, and oral ivermectin in patients of uncomplicated scabies
【24h】

Comparative efficacy and safety of topical permethrin, topical ivermectin, and oral ivermectin in patients of uncomplicated scabies

机译:单纯性ab疮患者局部苄氯菊酯,伊维菌素和口服伊维菌素的比较疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Ivermectin has opened a new era in the management of scabies as orally effective drug. However, topical route has been little explored for ivermectin. Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical permethrin, oral ivermectin, and topical ivermectin in the treatment of uncomplicated scabies. Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, comparative, parallel clinical trial conducted in 315 patients, randomly allocated to 3 groups. First group received permethrin 5% cream as single application, second group received tablet ivermectin 200 mcg/kg as single dose, and third group received ivermectin 1% lotion as single application. All the patients received anti-histaminic for pruritus. The patients were followed up at intervals of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. If there were no signs of cure, the same intervention was repeated at each follow up. Primary efficacy variable was clinical cure of lesions. Statistical analysis was done by chi square test and one way ANOVA test using SPSS version 12. Results: At the end of first week, cure rate was 74.8% in permethrin group, 30% in oral ivermectin group, and 69.3% in topical ivermectin group (P < 0.05). At the end of second week, cure rate was 99% in permethrin group, 63% in oral ivermectin group, and 100% in topical ivermectin group (P < 0.05). At the end of third week, 100% cure rate was observed in permethrin and topical ivermectin group while 99% in oral ivermectin group (P = 0.367). No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Permethrin and topical ivermectin were equally effective against scabies while oral ivermectin was significantly less effective up to 2 weeks. Topical ivermectin can be used as an alternative to permethrin.
机译:背景:伊维菌素在of疮作为口服有效药物的治疗方面开辟了一个新时代。但是,关于伊维菌素的局部用药途径很少探索。目的:比较局部氯菊酯,口服伊维菌素和局部伊维菌素治疗单纯性sc疮的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项对315例患者进行的开放标签,随机,比较,平行临床试验,随机分为3组。第一组单次使用氯菊酯5%乳膏,第二组单次使用伊维菌素200 mcg / kg片剂,第三组单次应用伊维菌素1%洗剂。所有患者均接受抗组胺药治疗瘙痒。每隔1、2、3和4周对患者进行随访。如果没有治愈的迹象,则在每次随访中重复相同的干预措施。主要疗效变量是病变的临床治愈。采用卡方检验和单因素方差分析采用SPSS 12版进行统计分析。结果:苄氯菊酯组治愈率分别为74.8%,伊维菌素组30%,局部伊维菌素组69.3%。 (P <0.05)。第二周结束时,氯菊酯组治愈率为99%,口服伊维菌素组治愈率为63%,局部伊维菌素组治愈率为100%(P <0.05)。第三周结束时,氯菊酯和伊维菌素局部治疗组治愈率为100%,口服伊维菌素组为99%(P = 0.367)。没有观察到严重的不良事件。结论:苄氯菊酯和局部伊维菌素对sc疮的治疗效果相同,而口服伊维菌素在2周内的疗效明显较差。局部伊维菌素可以用作氯菊酯的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号