首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Upfront allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensityonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A study by the société fran?aise de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire
【24h】

Upfront allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensityonmyeloablative conditioning for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: A study by the société fran?aise de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire

机译:骨髓增生异常综合症患者低强度/非清髓性调理后的前期同种异体干细胞移植:这家法国公司的骨髓移植和细胞治疗研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cytoreduction before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes remains a debatable issue. After excluding patients who had received preconditioning induction chemotherapy, we analyzed 128 consecutive patients with myelodysplastic syndrome who received reduced-intensity or nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA) allo-SCT. Among them, 40 received azacitidine (AZA) before transplant (AZA group) and 88 were transplanted up front (best supportive care [BSC] group). At diagnosis, 55 patients had intermediate 2 or high-risk scores per the International Prognostic Scoring System and 33 had a high cytogenetic risk score. Progression to a more advanced disease before allo-SCT was recorded in 22 patients. Source of stem cells were blood (n=112) or marrow (n=16) from sibling (n=78) or HLA-matched unrelated (n=50) donors. With a median follow-up of 60months, 3-year overall survival, relapse-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, and nonrelapse mortality were, respectively, 53% versus 53% (P=69), 37% versus 42% (P=78), 35% versus 36% (P=99), and 20% versus 23% (P=74), for the AZA group and BSC group, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the absence of statistical differences in outcome between the AZA and BSC groups, after adjusting for potential confounders using the propensity score approach. The absence of cytoreduction before RIC/NMA allo-SCT did not seem to alter the outcome. However, our results emphasize the need to perform prospective protocols to delineate the role of debulking strategy and to identify subsets of patients who may benefit from this approach.
机译:骨髓增生异常综合症患者同种异体干细胞移植(allo-SCT)之前的细胞减少仍然是一个有争议的问题。在排除接受预处理诱导化疗的患者后,我们分析了连续128例接受强度降低或非清髓条件(RIC / NMA)allo-SCT的骨髓增生异常综合症患者。其中,有40例在移植前接受了阿扎胞苷(AZA)治疗(AZA组),有88例被提前移植(最佳支持治疗[BSC]组)。诊断时,根据国际预后评分系统,有55位患者的中级或高危评分为2分,而细胞遗传学风险评分为33例。在记录到异基因SCT之前有22例患者进展为更晚期的疾病。干细胞的来源是兄弟姐妹(n = 78)或HLA匹配的无关(n = 50)供体的血液(n = 112)或骨髓(n = 16)。中位随访60个月,3年总生存率,无复发生存率,累积复发率和非复发死亡率分别为53%对53%(P = 69),37%对42%(P AZA组和BSC组分别为= 78),35%对36%(P = 99)和20%对23%(P = 74)。在使用倾向评分法调整了潜在的混杂因素后,多变量分析证实了AZA组和BSC组之间结局的统计差异。 RIC / NMA allo-SCT之前没有细胞减少似乎没有改变结局。但是,我们的结果强调需要执行前瞻性协议以描述减量策略的作用并确定可能从该方法中受益的患者子集。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号