首页> 外文期刊>Avian Biology Research >Feather-damaging behaviour in companion parrots: an initial analysis of potential demographic risk factors.
【24h】

Feather-damaging behaviour in companion parrots: an initial analysis of potential demographic risk factors.

机译:伴侣鹦鹉的羽毛损害行为:对潜在人口统计学危险因素的初步分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Captive parrots (Psittaciformes) commonly engage in "feather-damaging behaviour" (FDB) that suggests compromised welfare. Susceptibilities to FDB have been suggested, but not empirically demonstrated, to vary across the >200 species kept in captivity. Other demographic risk factors have been proposed for particular species - but neither confirmed nor generalised across Psittaciformes. In this preliminary study, we analysed data from a previously-conducted survey of pet owners: among 538 companion parrots representing 10 non-domesticated, non-hybrid species (n>=17/species), FDB prevalence was 15.8% overall. We tested whether individual FDB status was predicted by four previously-suggested demographic risk factors: species, sex, age, or hatch origin. Available (limited) data on husbandry were assessed as potential confounding variables and controlled for as appropriate. Species identity was a predictor of FDB status (P=0.047), even after controlling for all other variables tested; however, in light of multiple statistical testing, this effect cannot be considered robust until it is replicated. The strongest predictors of FDB status were age (P=0.001; with odds of positive FDB status lower in juveniles versus adolescents or adults [P<=0.036]), and sex (P=0.006; with odds of FDB lower in individuals of unknown, versus known, sex [P<=0.037]). These findings need to be replicated with data that allow better statistical controls for systematic differences in housing. However, they do provide preliminary empirical evidence for within-species risk factors (suggesting new, testable hypotheses about the etiology of parrot FDB); and for intrinsic, cross-species differences in FDB susceptibility (providing a rationale for future study of the biological factors that might underpin any such taxonomic differences).
机译:圈养鹦鹉(鹦鹉形鹦鹉)通常从事“损害羽毛的行为”(FDB),暗示其福利受到损害。已经提出,但没有经验证明对FDB的敏感性在圈养的200多个物种中有所不同。对于特定物种,还提出了其他人口统计学风险因素-但在斜形动物中尚未得到证实或推广。在这项初步研究中,我们分析了之前进行的宠物主人调查的数据:在代表10种非驯养,非杂交物种(n> = 17 /物种)的538只鹦鹉中,FDB的总体患病率为15.8%。我们测试了是否通过四个先前建议的人口统计学风险因素预测了个体FDB的状态:物种,性别,年龄或孵化场。有关畜牧业的可用(有限)数据被评估为潜在的混杂变量,并在适当时加以控制。即使控制了所有其他变量,物种身份也是FDB状态的预测指标(P = 0.047)。但是,根据多次统计测试,在复制之前,不能认为此效果是可靠的。 FDB状态最强的预测因子是年龄(P = 0.001;青少年,青少年或成年人中FDB状态阳性的几率较低[P <= 0.036])和性别(P = 0.006;未知人群中FDB状态的几率较低) ,而不是已知的性别[P <= 0.037])。这些发现需要与数据重复使用,以更好地控制住房方面的系统差异。但是,它们确实为种内风险因素提供了初步的经验证据(建议有关鹦鹉FDB病因的新的,可检验的假设);以及针对FDB易感性的内在,跨物种差异(为将来研究可能支持任何此类分类差异的生物学因素提供了理论依据)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号