...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >A network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
【24h】

A network meta-analysis of everolimus plus exemestane versus chemotherapy in the first- and second-line treatment of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer

机译:依维莫司联合依西美坦与化学疗法在一线和二线治疗雌激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌的网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy to exemestane plus everolimus (EXE/EVE) through a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials. NMA methods extend standard pairwise meta-analysis to allow simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments while maintaining randomization of individual studies. The method enables "direct" evidence (i.e., evidence from studies directly comparing two interventions) and "indirect" evidence (i.e., evidence from studies that do not compare the two interventions directly) to be pooled under the assumption of evidence consistency. We used NMA to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) curves in 34 studies, and response rate (RR) and the hazard ratios (HRs) of the PFS/TTP in 36 studies. A number needed to treat (NNT) analysis was also performed as well as descriptive comparison of reported toxicities. The NMA for PFS/TTP curves and for HR shows EXE/EVE is more efficacious than capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, megestrol acetate and tamoxifen, with an average of related-PFS/TTP difference ranging from about 10 months for capecitabine plus sunitinib to more than 6 months for tamoxifen. The NMA for overall RR shows that EXE/EVE provides a better RR than bevacizumab plus capecitabine, capecitabine, capecitabine plus sorafenib, capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, gemcitabine plus epirubicin plus paclitaxel, EVE plus tamoxifen, EXE, FEC, megestrol acetate, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen. Finally, the NMA for NNT shows that EXE/EVE is more beneficial as compared to BMF, capecitabine, capecitabine plus sunitinib, CMF, FEC, megestrol acetate, mitoxantrone, and tamoxifen. The combination of EXE/EVE as first- or second-line therapy for ER+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer is more efficacious than several chemotherapy regimens that were reported in the literature. Toxicities also favored EXE/EVE in most instances.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较化疗对依西美坦联合依维莫司(EXE / EVE)的疗效和毒性。 NMA方法扩展了标准的成对荟萃分析,以允许同时比较多种治疗方法,同时保持各个研究的随机性。该方法使得可以在证据一致性的假设下汇总“直接”证据(即,来自直接比较两种干预的研究的证据)和“间接”证据(即,不直接比较两种干预的研究的证据)。我们使用NMA在34项研究中评估了无进展生存期(PFS)和进展时间(TTP)曲线,并在36项研究中评估了PFS / TTP的缓解率(RR)和危险比(HRs)。还进行了许多治疗(NNT)分析所需的数据,并对报告的毒性进行了描述性比较。针对PFS / TTP曲线和HR的NMA显示,EXE / EVE比卡培他滨加舒尼替尼,CMF,醋酸孕甾酮和他莫昔芬更有效,与PFS / TTP相关的平均差异范围为卡培他滨加舒尼替尼约10个月,甚至更多。他莫昔芬用药超过6个月。 NMA的总RR显示,EXE / EVE比贝伐单抗加卡培他滨,卡培他滨,卡培他滨加索拉非尼,卡培他滨加舒尼替尼,CMF,吉西他滨加表柔比星加紫杉醇,EVE加他莫昔芬,EXE,FEC,醋酸甲羟孕酮,和他莫昔芬。最后,NNT的NMA显示,与BMF,卡培他滨,卡培他滨加舒尼替尼,CMF,FEC,醋酸孕甾酮,米托蒽醌和他莫昔芬相比,EXE / EVE更有益。 EXE / EVE组合作为ER + ve / HER2-ve转移性乳腺癌的一线或二线疗法比文献中报道的几种化疗方案更有效。在大多数情况下,毒性也倾向于EXE / EVE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号