...
【24h】

Arthroscopically Assisted Shoulder Arthrodesis: Is It an Effective Technique?

机译:关节镜辅助肩关节固定术:这是一种有效的技术吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of open and mini-open arthroscopic arthrodesis. Methods: Twelve patients underwent arthroscopically assisted glenohumeral arthrodesis over a 5-year period; none were lost to follow-up. Surgery was performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, with the arm positioned in 30 degrees each of flexion, internal rotation, and abduction. The articular cartilage was arthroscopically removed from the humerus and glenoid, creating flat opposing surfaces. One to 2 Kirschner wires were inserted percutaneously through the deltoid and across the glenohumeral joint in the center of the articulation; screws were then inserted arthroscopically. The glenohumeral joint was accessed through a mini-open posterior approach beneath the deltoid and was then reassessed before cannulated screws were tightened completely to compress the joint. Two dynamic compression plates were applied to the posterior glenohumeral joint to neutralize rotatory forces. Each patient was immobilized for 6 weeks. Follow-up radiographic imaging was performed at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. These patients were then compared with a similar group who underwent a classic open approach. Success of arthrodesis was determined by bone growth across the glenohumeral joint as visualized on axillary radiographs. Results: At 2-year follow-up, complete fusion was achieved in 12 (100%) arthroscopically treated patients, with 2 patients (17%) having early bone grafting (within 6 weeks) through a percutaneous approach. Four patients in the classic open approach group ("open group") required additional grafting. Two patients in the group undergoing arthroscopic surgery ("arthroscopic group") had solid fusion but persisting infection from previously failed operations. Comparison of the 2 groups showed no difference in patient satisfaction or infection rates (2 in each group, all of whom had active infection at the time of the index surgery). One patient in the open group sustained a humeral shaft fracture 5 years after arthrodesis, which required additional surgery. No patient who underwent an arthroscopic procedure required additional surgery other than the 2 early bone grafts. Conclusions: Arthroscopically assisted mini-open glenohumeral arthrodesis provides results that are at least equal to those of open arthrodesis, with a much less invasive approach. Success and complication rates are the same as for the completely open procedure.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较开放式和微型开放式关节镜关节固定术的临床和影像学结果。方法:12名患者在5年的时间内接受了关节镜辅助的盂肱关节固定术;没有人失去后续行动。病人在侧卧位进行手术,手臂置于屈曲,内旋和外展各30度。在关节镜下从肱骨和盂盂除去关节软骨,形成平坦的相对表面。将一到两根Kirschner线经皮插入穿过三角肌,并穿过关节中央的盂肱关节。然后用关节镜插入螺钉。通过三角肌下方的微型后路入路进入肱肱关节,然后在完全拧紧空心螺钉以压缩关节之前进行重新评估。将两个动态压缩板应用于肱骨后关节,以抵消旋转力。每个患者固定6周。术后2、6、12和24个月进行了放射线照相成像。然后将这些患者与接受经典开放治疗的相似人群进行比较。通过腋窝X线片上可见的跨肱肱关节的骨生长来确定关节固定术是否成功。结果:在2年的随访中,经关节镜治疗的12例患者(100%)实现了完全融合,其中2例(17%)通过经皮方法进行了早期骨移植(6周内)。经典开放手术组(“开放组”)中的四名患者需要额外的移植。进行关节镜手术的组(“关节镜组”)中的两名患者进行了牢固的融合,但是由于先前失败的手术而持续感染。两组的比较显示,患者满意度或感染率无差异(每组2例,在索引手术时所有患者均患有活动性感染)。开放组中的一名患者在关节固定术后5年出现了肱骨干骨折,需要进行额外的手术。除了进行2例早期植骨手术外,没有进行过关节镜检查的患者无需进行其他手术。结论:关节镜辅助的微型开放性肱肱关节固定术的侵入性小得多,其结果至少等于开放性关节固定术。成功率和并发症发生率与完全开放手术相同。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号