首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Asymmetry in Femoral Tunnel Socket Length During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transportal, Outside-In, and Modified Transtibial Techniques
【24h】

Asymmetry in Femoral Tunnel Socket Length During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transportal, Outside-In, and Modified Transtibial Techniques

机译:通过运输,外入内和改良胫骨技术重建前交叉韧带期间股骨隧道窝长度的不对称性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To investigate the mismatch between the length at the center and the length on the shortest and longest peripheral sides of the femoral tunnel socket, reamed with the transportal (TP), outside-in (OI), and modified transtibial (TT) techniques, in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Femoral tunnel drilling was simulated on 3dimensional bone models from 40 subjects. The tunnel directions used with the TP, OI, and modified TT techniques were previously described. By use of the resulting angle, a femoral tunnel socket of 9 mm in diameter was drilled from the center of the femoral ACL insertion. The virtual femoral tunnel was extracted, and the length mismatch was measured between the center and the shortest and longest peripheral sides of the tunnel socket. Results: The mean socket length mismatch between the center and the shortest peripheral part of the femoral tunnel socket was 4.2 +/- 0.9 mm with the TP technique, 5.2 +/- 1.3 mm with the OI technique, and 3.2 +/- 0.8 mm with the modified TT technique. The mean socket length mismatch between the center and the longest peripheral part of the femoral tunnel socket was 3.5 +/- 0.9 mm with the TP technique, 4.8 +/- 1.5 mm with the OI technique, and 3.3 +/- 1.2 mm with the modified TT technique. The length mismatch was significantly higher when the tunnel socket was created by the OI technique (P < .01). Conclusions: A length mismatch with the tunnel socket exists after reaming with either the TP, OI, or modified TT technique. In particular, there was a significant increase in length mismatch when the tunnel socket was created by the OI technique, and the length mismatch would easily become greater than 5 mm. The surgeon should recognize this mismatch when it is created and measure the femoral tunnel socket.
机译:目的:研究股骨隧道窝中心的长度与最短和最长的外周侧的长度之间的不匹配,并采用运输(TP),外入(OI)和改良的胫骨(TT)技术进行扩孔,在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中。方法:在来自40位受试者的三维骨模型上模拟了股骨隧道钻孔。先前已描述了TP,OI和改进的TT技术使用的隧道方向。利用所得的角度,从股骨ACL插入的中心钻出直径为9 mm的股骨隧道插口。提取虚拟的股骨隧道,并测量隧道承窝的中心与最短和最长周边之间的长度不匹配。结果:采用TP技术时,股骨隧道窝中心和最短周边部分之间的平均窝长度失配为TP技术为4.2 +/- 0.9 mm,OI技术为5.2 +/- 1.3 mm,以及3.2 +/- 0.8 mm改进的TT技术。使用TP技术时,股骨隧道插口的中心和最长的外周部分之间的平均插槽长度不匹配,采用TP技术时为3.5 +/- 0.9 mm,使用OI技术时为4.8 +/- 1.5 mm,而采用OI技术时为3.3 +/- 1.2 mm。改进的TT技术。当通过OI技术创建隧道套接字时,长度不匹配率明显更高(P <.01)。结论:用TP,OI或改进的TT技术扩孔后,与隧道插座的长度不匹配。特别地,当通过OI技术创建隧道插座时,长度不匹配显着增加,并且长度不匹配将容易变得大于5mm。外科医生应在造成这种不匹配时识别出这种不匹配,并测量股骨隧道插口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号