...
首页> 外文期刊>Arzneimittel-Forschung: =Drug Research >Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two different clindamycin capsule formulations: a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, two-way crossover clinical trial in healthy volunteers.
【24h】

Comparative pharmacokinetics study of two different clindamycin capsule formulations: a randomized, two-period, two-sequence, two-way crossover clinical trial in healthy volunteers.

机译:两种不同的克林霉素胶囊制剂的比较药代动力学研究:在健康志愿者中进行的随机,两周期,两序列,两路交叉临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study of two brands of clindamycin hydrochloride (CAS 21462-39-5) was carried out on 32 healthy Indian subjects in an open label randomized, two way crossover, two period, two sequence, two treatment trial with a minimum washout period of 7 days. Plasma samples were collected at 10 min interval for the 1st hour, at 1 h interval for the next 6 h, at 2 h interval for next 12 h and finally at the 24th hour (pre-dose as baseline value) after drug administration. The concentrations of clindamycin in plasma were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique with UV detector [lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) 0.05 microg x mL(-1)). All PK parameters were calculated from data on clindamycin content in plasma using a non-compartmental model. Primary PK parameters were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve from zero to t(th) hour (AUCT) and area under the curve from zero to infinite (AUCI), whereas secondary PK parameters were elimination half-life (t half), elimination rate constant (K el) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax). All primary PK parameters (log transformed) were subjected to ANOVA analysis and two one-sided Student's t-test (TOST) to construct the 90% confidence intervals. The result of ANOVA showed that all primary PK parameters at 90% confident intervals were within the limit of 80-125%. All the values such as 95.7-109.00% for Cmax, 99.5-117% for AUCT and 99.1% to 114% for AUCI showed pharmacokinetic equivalence and indicated that this comparative pharmacokinetic study was well designed to conclude that the test formulation and reference formulation were pharmacokinetically equivalent and hence bioequivalent with respect to rate and extent of absorption.
机译:在32名健康的印度受试者中,对32个健康的印度受试者进行了两个品牌的盐酸克林霉素的比较药代动力学(PK)研究,该研究随机开放,双向,两个周期,两个序列,两个治疗试验进行,最短冲洗期为7天。在给药后第1小时以10分钟间隔,在接下来的6h以1h间隔,在接下来的12h以2h间隔,最后在第24小时(以剂量前为基线值)间隔收集血浆样品。使用高效液相色谱(HPLC)技术和紫外线检测器[定量下限(LLOQ)0.05 microg x mL(-1)]测定血浆中克林霉素的浓度。使用非房室模型,根据血浆中克林霉素含量的数据计算所有PK参数。主要PK参数为最大血浆浓度(Cmax),从零到t(th)小时的曲线下面积(AUCT)和从零到无限大的曲线下面积(AUCI),而第二个PK参数为消除半衰期(t一半),消除速率常数(K el)和达到最大血浆浓度的时间(Tmax)。对所有主要PK参数(对数转换)进行ANOVA分析和两个单侧学生t检验(TOST),以构建90%的置信区间。方差分析的结果表明,所有主要PK参数在90%置信区间内均在80-125%的范围内。所有值,例如Cmax的95.7-109.00%,AUCT的99.5-117%和AUCI的99.1%至114%,均显示出药代动力学等效性,并表明该比较药代动力学研究设计合理,可得出结论:测试制剂和参考制剂均具有药代动力学在吸收速率和吸收程度方面是等效的,因此是生物等效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号