...
首页> 外文期刊>ASEE Prism >LEGO VS. UNIVERSAL DESIGN: Gender-specific toys are the wrong model for engineering curricula
【24h】

LEGO VS. UNIVERSAL DESIGN: Gender-specific toys are the wrong model for engineering curricula

机译:乐高与通用设计:针对性别的玩具是工程课程的错误模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

If you've been in a toy store recently, you may have noticed that LEGO has a new line of toys called LEGO Friends. In the early 2000s, LEGO was in trouble: Sales were down, and a succession of money-losing missteps had pushed the company to the brink of bankruptcy. It brought in a new CEO and launched a major global research project to understand how children play. One of the findings was that boys preferred toys with strong narratives, while girls were more likely to enjoy role playing. Accordingly, LEGO designed the Friends line for girls: larger figures, a range of settings, and a pink, purple, and teal color scheme. By all accounts, it's been a success.
机译:如果您最近去过玩具店,您可能会注意到LEGO推出了一个新玩具行,称为LEGO Friends。在2000年代初期,乐高陷入困境:销售下降,并且一系列亏损的失误使公司濒临破产边缘。它引入了新的首席执行官,并启动了一项重要的全球研究项目,以了解儿童的游戏方式。研究结果之一是,男孩偏爱叙述性强的玩具,而女孩更喜欢角色扮演。因此,乐高为女孩设计了Friends系列:更大的身材,一系列的设置以及粉红色,紫色和青绿色的配色方案。从所有人的角度来看,这都是成功的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号