...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Joint line tenderness and Mcmurray tests for the detection of meniscal lesions: What is their real diagnostic value?
【24h】

Joint line tenderness and Mcmurray tests for the detection of meniscal lesions: What is their real diagnostic value?

机译:联合压痛和Mcmurray测试对半月板病变的检测:它们的真正诊断价值是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives: To assess the interobserver concordance of the joint line tenderness (JLT) and McMurray tests, and to determine their diagnostic efficiency for the detection of meniscal lesions. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: Orthopedics outpatient clinic, university hospital. Participants: Patients (N=60) with suspected nonacute meniscal lesions who underwent knee arthroscopy. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Patients were examined by 3 independent observers with graded levels of experience (>10y, 3y, and 4mo of practice). The interobserver concordance was assessed by Cohen-Fleiss κ statistics. Accuracy, negative and positive predictive values for prevalence 10% to 90%, positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, and the Bayesian posttest probability with a positive or negative result were also determined. The diagnostic value of the 2 tests combined was assessed by logistic regression. Arthroscopy was used as the reference test. Results: No interobserver concordance was determined for the JLT. The McMurray test showed higher interobserver concordance, which improved when judgments by the less experienced examiner were discarded. The whole series studied by the "best" examiner (experienced orthopedist) provided the following values: (1) JLT: sensitivity, 62.9%; specificity, 50%; LR+, 1.26; LR-,.74; (2) McMurray: sensitivity, 34.3%; specificity, 86.4%; LR+, 2.52; LR-,.76. The combination of the 2 tests did not offer advantages over the McMurray alone. Conclusions: The JLT alone is of little clinical usefulness. A negative McMurray test does not modify the pretest probability of a meniscal lesion, while a positive result has a fair predictive value. Hence, in a patient with a suspected meniscal lesion, a positive McMurray test indicates that arthroscopy should be performed. In case of a negative result, further examinations, including imaging, are needed.
机译:目的:评估关节压痛(JLT)和McMurray测试在观察者间的一致性,并确定它们在检测半月板病变中的诊断效率。设计:前瞻性观察研究。地点:大学医院骨科门诊。参加者:接受膝关节镜检查的疑似非急性半月板病变的患者(N = 60)。干预措施:不适用。主要结果指标:由3名独立的观察者对患者进行检查,这些观察者的经验水平分级(大于10y,3y和4mo)。观察者之间的一致性由Cohen-Fleissκ统计量评估。还确定了准确率,患病率10%至90%的阳性和阴性预测值,阳性(LR +)和阴性(LR-)似然比以及贝叶斯事后概率(阳性或阴性)。通过逻辑回归评估了这两种测试的诊断价值。关节镜检查用作参考测试。结果:JLT没有确定观察者之间的一致性。 McMurray检验显示出较高的观察者间一致性,当经验较少的审查员的判断被放弃时,这种一致性得到改善。由“最佳”检查员(经验丰富的骨科医生)研究的整个系列提供以下值:(1)JLT:敏感性为62.9%;特异性为50%; LR +,1.26; LR-,. 74; (2)麦克默里:灵敏度为34.3%;特异性为86.4%; LR +,2.52; LR-,. 76。这两个测试的组合并没有提供超过单独使用McMurray的优势。结论:仅JLT几乎没有临床实用性。阴性的McMurray测试不会改变半月板病变的预检概率,而阳性的结果具有合理的预测价值。因此,对于怀疑有半月板病变的患者,McMurray试验阳性表明应进行关节镜检查。如果结果为阴性,则需要进一步检查,包括影像学检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号