首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >ASAS modification of the Berlin algorithm for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: Results from the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE)-cohort and from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-cohort
【24h】

ASAS modification of the Berlin algorithm for diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: Results from the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE)-cohort and from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)-cohort

机译:ASAS对诊断轴向性脊椎关节炎的柏林算法的修改:来自早期脊柱关节炎(SPACE)队列和国际脊柱关节炎评估(ASAS)队列的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To compare the original Berlin algorithm for diagnosing axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with two modifications in the SPondyloArthritis Caught Early (SPACE)-cohort and the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) axSpA criteria validation (ASAS)-cohort. Methods Patients in the SPACE-cohort (back pain ≥3 months, ≤2 years, onset <45 years) and the ASAScohort (undiagnosed chronic back pain) were diagnosed according to three algorithms: original (inflammatory back pain (IBP) mandatory), modification 1 (IBP defined by ≥3/5 IBP-features instead of ≥4/5) and modification 2 (IBP deleted as obligatory entry criterion, added as SpAfeature). Diagnosis by rheumatologist, ASAS axSpA criteria and likelihood ratio product were used as external standards to test the performance of the algorithms. Results SPACE-cohort: Compared to the diagnosis by rheumatologist (either axSpA or no-axSpA), the original algorithm agreed in 120 patients (76.4%). Agreement decreased using modification 1 (119 patients; 75.8%), increased using modification 2 (125 patients; 79.6%). Sensitivity increased from 66.2% (original) to 72.3% (modification 1) and 78.5% (modification 2). Specificity decreased more using modification 1 (83.7% to 78.3%) than when using modification 2 (83.7% to 79.6%). ASAS-cohort: Compared to the diagnosis by rheumatologist (either axSpA or no-axSpA), the original algorithm agreed in 484 patients (70.7%). Agreement increased using modification 1 (520 patients; 75.9%) and modification 2 (548 patients; 80.0%). Sensitivity increased from 65.3% (original) to 77.9% (modification 1) and 79.6% (modification 2). Specificity decreased more using modification 1 (79.2% to 72.2%) than when using modification 2 (79.2% to 75.6%). Conclusions ASAS accepted a modified algorithm for diagnosing axSpA in which IBP is excluded as obligatory entry criterion and added as SpA-feature.
机译:目的比较原始柏林诊断轴突性脊椎关节炎(axSpA)的方法,并在脊椎风湿性关节炎早期(SPACE)队列和国际脊柱关节炎评估(ASAS)axSpA标准验证(ASAS)队列中进行两种修改。方法:根据以下三种算法诊断SPACE队列(背痛≥3个月,≤2年,发病<45岁)和ASAS队列(未诊断为慢性背痛)的患者:原始算法(强制性炎症性背痛(IBP)),修改1(由≥3/ 5 IBP功能而不是≥4/ 5定义的IBP)和修改2(将IBP删除为强制进入标准,添加为SpAfeature)。由风湿病学家诊断,ASAS axSpA标准和似然比乘积用作外部标准,以测试算法的性能。结果SPACE队列:与风湿病专家的诊断(axSpA或no-axSpA)相比,最初的算法在120例患者中占76.4%。使用修改1时,协议减少(119位患者; 75.8%),使用修改2(125位患者; 79.6%)时,协议减少。灵敏度从66.2%(原始)提高到72.3%(修改1)和​​78.5%(修改2)。与使用修饰例2(83.7%至79.6%)相比,使用修饰例1(83.7%至78.3%)的特异性降低更多。 ASAS队列:与风湿病学家的诊断(axSpA或no-axSpA)相比,原始算法在484例患者中占了比例(70.7%)。使用修改1(520例患者; 75.9%)和修改2(548例患者; 80.0%)可以提高一致性。灵敏度从65.3%(原始)增加到77.9%(修改1)和​​79.6%(修改2)。与使用修饰例2(79.2%至75.6%)相比,使用修饰例1(79.2%至72.2%)的特异性降低得更多。结论ASAS接受了一种用于诊断axSpA的改进算法,其中排除了IBP作为强制进入标准,并添加为SpA功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号