...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection >Compost tea as soil drench: an alternative approach to control bacterial wilt in brinjal.
【24h】

Compost tea as soil drench: an alternative approach to control bacterial wilt in brinjal.

机译:堆肥茶作为土壤浸湿:控制茄子中细菌枯萎的另一种方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An experiment was conducted in the field laboratory, Department of Plant Pathology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, to evaluate the efficacy of compost tea and poultry litter extract along with their economic feasibility of their usage in controlling bacterial wilt of brinjal under natural incidence condition. A significant variation was observed among the treatments on the incidence and severity of bacterial wilt in brinjal. The results showed that the lowest wilt incidence was recorded in T2 (Compost tea as soil drenching), T5 (Poultry litter as soil application) and T6 (IPM Lab Biopesticide as soil application) while the highest wilt incidence was recorded in control treatment in both counting periods. Similar trend regarding the performance of these treatments was observed on the bacterial wilt severity of brinjal. The effects of compost tea and poultry litter extract on the growth and yield parameters of eggplant were observed to be significant. The results revealed that plant height, number of branches per plant, number of fruits per plant and fruit yield per ha were recorded as maximum in T2 (Compost tea as soil drenching), followed by T5 (Poultry litter as soil application) and T6 (IPM Lab Biopesticide as soil application), while the minimum plant height, number of branches per plant, number of fruits per plant and fruit yield were recorded in control treatment (T1). The other treatments showed significant effect in increasing all the growth and yield parameters of brinjal as compared to control. Benefit cost analyses (BCR) showed that T6 (IPM Lab Biopesticide as soil application) resulted in the highest BCR (99.21) as compared to control, followed by T7 (BAU-Biofungicide as foliar spray) and T2 (Compost tea as soil drenching) with BCR 35.7 and 19.5, respectively. The results indicated that an investment of Tk. 1.00 may lead to a profit up to Tk. 99.21 by soil application of IPM Lab Biopesticide which gave the maximum profit in the present study. T7 (BAU-Biofungicide as foliar spray) followed T2 (Compost tea as soil drenching) where the investment Tk. 1.00 returned a profit of Tk. 35.70 and Tk. 19.5, respectively. Soil drenching of compost tea showed comparatively lower BCR but the highest percent increase of gross margin was obtained when compost tea was applied as soil drench (T2). Therefore, it may be concluded that soil drenching of compost tea may be an alternative approach to control bacterial wilt of brinjal along with other possible organic amendments.
机译:在Mymensingh的孟加拉国农业大学植物病理学系的田间实验室进行了一项实验,以评估堆肥茶和家禽垃圾提取物的功效,以及它们在自然发病条件下控制茄子枯萎病的经济可行性。在治疗方法中,茄子的细菌性青枯病的发生率和严重程度之间存在显着差异。结果表明,最低的青枯发生率记录在T 2 (堆肥茶作为土壤淋雨),T 5 (家禽垃圾作为土壤施用)和T 6 (IPM实验室生物农药作为土壤施用),而在两个计数期的对照处理中都记录了最高的枯萎率。在茄子的青枯病严重程度方面,也观察到了有关这些治疗方法的类似趋势。观察到堆肥茶和家禽垃圾提取物对茄子生长和产量参数的影响是显着的。结果表明,T 2 (堆肥茶淋湿)中的株高,单株枝数,单株果实数和每公顷果实产量均以最大值记录,其次是T 5 (家禽垃圾作为土壤施用)和T 6 (IPM实验室生物农药作为土壤施用),而最小株高,单株枝数,单株果实数和对照处理(T 1 )记录了果实产量。与对照相比,其他处理在增加茄子的所有生长和产量参数方面显示出显著作用。效益成本分析(BCR)显示,与对照相比,T 6 (IPM实验室生物农药作为土壤施用)导致最高BCR(99.21),其次是T 7 ( BAU-生物杀真菌剂(叶面喷洒)和T 2 (堆肥茶浸透土壤)的BCR分别为35.7和19.5。结果表明投资Tk。 1.00可能会导致最高Tk的利润。在土壤中施用IPM实验室生物农药可达到99.21,在本研究中获得最大收益。 T 7 (BAU-生物杀真菌剂,叶面喷洒)紧随T 2 (堆肥茶,浸透土壤),投资Tk。 1.00返回Tk的利润。 35.70和Tk。 19.5。堆肥茶的土壤浸润显示出较低的BCR,但是当将堆肥茶作为土壤浸透(T 2 )时,毛利率增加最高。因此,可以得出结论,将堆肥茶浸透土壤可能是控制茄子细菌枯萎病以及其他可能的有机改良剂的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号