首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Is extracorporeal shock wave therapy clinical efficacy for relief of chronic, recalcitrant plantar fasciitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo or active-treatment controlled trials
【24h】

Is extracorporeal shock wave therapy clinical efficacy for relief of chronic, recalcitrant plantar fasciitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo or active-treatment controlled trials

机译:体外冲击波疗法是否可缓解慢性顽固性足底筋膜炎的临床疗效?随机安慰剂或积极治疗对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To assess the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and provide clinicians with an evidence base for their clinical decision making. Data Sources PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Study Selection All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of ESWT for chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis were searched. Searching identified 108 potentially relevant articles; of these, 7 studies with 550 participants met inclusion criteria. Data Extraction Number of patients, population, body mass index, duration of symptoms, adverse effects, blinding method, and details of shockwave therapy were extracted. Data Synthesis For intervention success rate, ESWT of low intensity was more effective than control treatment of low intensity. For pain relief, the pooled data showed a significant difference between the ESWT and control groups. For function, only low-intensity ESWT was significantly superior over the control treatment. Conclusions The efficacy of low-intensity ESWT is worthy of recognition. The short-term pain relief and functional outcomes of this treatment are satisfactory. However, owing to the lack of a long-term follow-up, its long-term efficacy remains unknown.
机译:目的评估体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)的疗效,并为临床医生的临床决策提供依据。数据来源PubMed,MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane对照试验中央注册和循证医学评论。研究选择检索所有针对慢性顽固性足底筋膜炎的ESWT的随机或半随机对照试验。搜索确定的108篇潜在相关文章;其中,有550名参与者的7项研究符合纳入标准。数据提取提取患者人数,人群,体重指数,症状持续时间,不良反应,致盲方法以及冲击波治疗的详细信息。数据综合对于干预成功率,低强度ESWT比低强度ESWT更有效。为了缓解疼痛,汇总数据显示ESWT组和对照组之间存在显着差异。就功能而言,仅低强度ESWT显着优于对照治疗。结论低强度ESWT的疗效值得肯定。这种治疗的短期疼痛缓解和功能效果令人满意。但是,由于缺乏长期随访,其长期疗效仍然未知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号