...
首页> 外文期刊>Breastfeeding medicine: the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine >Calculating Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates: Comparing Dietary '24-Hour Recall' with Recall 'Since Birth' Methods
【24h】

Calculating Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates: Comparing Dietary '24-Hour Recall' with Recall 'Since Birth' Methods

机译:计算纯母乳喂养率:比较膳食“ 24小时召回”和召回“自出生”方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Calculating exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates based on the previous-day recall has been recommended by the World Health Organization to avoid the recall bias but it also may not accurately reflect the feeding pattern since birth and leads to overestimate of the proportion of exclusively breastfed infants. The objective of this study was to compare the (EBF) rates calculated by the 24-hour recall and since birth recall and their association with different sociodemographic and maternal data. Subjects and Methods: Prospective descriptive study in Mansoura District including 1,102 mother-infant dyad attending primary healthcare centers for vaccination. One thousand ninety-one and 1,029 were followed up at 4 and 6 months during a period from January to October 2015. Sociodemographic data, maternal, antenatal, birth, and some infant related data were collected through interview. Questions about EBF using the 24-hour recall and since birth recall definitions were asked. Results: This study shows consistent difference in breastfeeding pattern reported by 24-hour recall with recall since birth at all age intervals. At the age of 6 months 13.6% of infants were EBF as reported by 24-hour recall method versus 5.2% for recall since birth method. Different factors were associated with EBF practice reported using these different methods. Conclusions: The two recall methods describe the reality in different and incomplete ways. It is better to measure and report EBF rated using both methods so as to give a full picture of breastfeeding practice. And it is very important to distinguish between both methods and not to be used interchangeably with each other.
机译:背景:世界卫生组织建议根据前一天的召回率计算纯母乳喂养率,以避免召回偏差,但它也可能无法准确反映出出生以来的喂养方式,并导致高估了纯母乳喂养的比例母乳喂养的婴儿。这项研究的目的是比较通过24小时召回和自出生召回以来计算的(EBF)率,以及它们与不同的社会人口统计学和孕产妇数据的关联。受试者与方法:前瞻性描述性研究在Mansoura地区进行,包括1,102名母婴双亲在初级卫生保健中心进行疫苗接种。在2015年1月至10月的4个月和6个月中,共追踪了191例和1,029例。通过访谈收集了社会人口统计学数据,孕产妇,产前,出生以及一些婴儿相关数据。有人询问了使用24小时召回和自出生以来召回定义的EBF。结果:这项研究显示,在所有年龄段的婴儿出生后的24小时召回与召回之间,母乳喂养方式始终存在差异。根据24小时召回方法的报告,在6个月大的婴儿中,有13.6%的婴儿为EBF,而自出生以来的召回率为5.2%。使用这些不同方法报告的EBF实践有不同的因素。结论:两种召回方法以不同且不完整的方式描述了现实。最好使用两种方法来测量和报告EBF等级,以便全面了解母乳喂养的做法。区分这两种方法并且不能彼此互换使用非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号