首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer.
【24h】

Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer.

机译:乳腺癌肿瘤成形术和象限切除术中手术切缘的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer is a novel concept that combines a plastic surgical procedure with breast-conserving treatment to improve the final cosmetic results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological safety of oncoplastic procedures by studying the status of the surgical margins of the excised tumor specimen in comparison with standard quadrantectomies. METHODS: Thirty consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery (group 1) and 30 patients undergoing standard quadrantectomy (group 2) were prospectively studied with regard to the stage of breast cancer, the surgical procedures performed, the volume of breast tissue excised, and the histopathology of the tumor specimen, with specific details on surgical margins. RESULTS: Patients who underwent oncoplastic surgery (group 1) were younger (mean age, 48.73 years) than patients who had a classic quadrantectomy (group 2; mean age, 55.76 years; P = .022). The mean volume of the excised specimen in group 1 was 200.18 cm(3), compared with 117.55 cm(3) in group 2 (P = .016). Surgical margins were negative in 25 cases out of 30 in group 1 and 17 out of 30 in group 2 (P = .05). The average length of the surgical margin was 8.5 mm in group 1 and 6.5 mm in group 2, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .074). CONCLUSIONS: Oncoplastic surgery adds to the oncological safety of breast-conserving treatment because a larger volume of breast tissue can be excised and a wider negative margin can be obtained. It is especially indicated for large tumors, for which standard breast-conserving treatment has a high probability of leaving positive margins.
机译:背景:用于乳腺癌的肿瘤整形外科手术是一个新颖的概念,将整形外科手术程序与保乳治疗相结合以改善最终的美容效果。这项研究的目的是通过与标准象限切除术相比,研究切除的肿瘤标本的手术切缘的状态来评估肿瘤整形手术的肿瘤学安全性。方法:前瞻性研究了连续30例接受肿瘤整形手术的乳腺癌患者(第1组)和30例接受标准象限切除术的患者(第2组)关于乳腺癌的分期,手术步骤,切除的乳腺组织的数量以及切除的方法。肿瘤标本的组织病理学,并详细说明手术切缘。结果:接受整容手术的患者(第1组)比接受经典象限切除术的患者(第2组;平均年龄:55.76岁; P = .022)年轻(平均年龄:48.73岁)。第1组中被切除标本的平均体积为200.18 cm(3),而第2组中为117.55 cm(3)(P = .016)。第一组30例中25例手术切缘阴性,第二组30例中17例手术切缘阴性(P = .05)。第一组的平均手术切缘长度为8.5 mm,第二组的平均切缘长度为6.5 mm,但差异无统计学意义(P = .074)。结论:肿瘤整形手术增加了保乳治疗的肿瘤学安全性,因为可以切除更大体积的乳房组织并获得更大的负切缘。特别适用于大型肿瘤,对于这些肿瘤,常规的保乳治疗很可能会留下阳性切缘。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号