首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group.
【24h】

Fluconazole vs low-dose amphotericin B for the prevention of fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: a study of the North American Marrow Transplant Group.

机译:氟康唑与小剂量两性霉素B预防骨髓移植患者的真菌感染:北美骨髓移植小组的一项研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Systemic fungal infections are a major problem in bone marrow transplant recipients who have prolonged neutropenia or who receive high-dose corticosteroids. Prophylaxis with Fluconazole or low-dose amphotericin B reduces, but does not eliminate these infections. To determine which prophylactic agent is better, we performed a prospective randomized study. Patients undergoing allogeneic (related or unrelated) or autologous marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive Fluconazole (400 mg/day p. o. or i.v.) or amphotericin B (0.2 mg/kg/day i.v.) beginning 1 day prior to stem cell transplantation and continuing until recovery of neutrophils to >500/microl. Patients were removed from their study drug for drug-associated toxicity, invasive fungal infection or suspected fungal infection (defined as the presence of fever >38 degrees C without positive culture while on broad-spectrum anti-bacterial antibiotics). Proven or suspected fungal infections were treated with high-dose amphotericin B (0.5-0.7 mg/kg/day). Patients were randomized at each institution and stratified for the type of transplant. The primary end-point of the study was prevention of documented fungal infection; secondary endpoints included fungal colonization, drug toxicity, duration of hospitalization, duration of fever, duration of neutropenia, duration and total dose of high-dose amphotericin B and overall survival to hospital discharge. From July 1992 to October 1994, a total of 355 patients entered into the trial with 159 patients randomized to amphotericin B and 196 to Fluconazole. Patient groups were comparable for diagnosis, age, sex, prior antibiotic or antifungal therapy, use of corticosteroids prior to transplantation and total duration of neutropenia. Amphotericin B was significantly more toxic than Fluconazole especially in related allogeneic transplantation where 19% of patients developed toxicity vs 0% of Fluconazole recipients (p < 0.05). Approximately 44% of all patients were removed from prophylaxis for presumed fungal infection. Proven fungal infections occurred in 4.1% and 7.5% of Fluconazole and amphotericin-treated patients, respectively. Proven fungal infections occurred in 9.1% and 14.3% of related allogeneic marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively, and 2.1% and 5.6% of autologous marrow recipients receiving Fluconazole or amphotericin B, respectively (P > 0.05). In this prospective trial, low-dose amphotericin B prophylaxis was as effective as Fluconazole prophylaxis, but Fluconazole was significantly better tolerated.
机译:在患有中性粒细胞减少症或接受大剂量皮质类固醇的骨髓移植受者中,全身性真菌感染是一个主要问题。用氟康唑或小剂量两性霉素B预防可减少但不能消除这些感染。为了确定哪种预防剂更好,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。接受异体(相关或无关)或自体骨髓或外周干细胞移植的患者在干细胞移植前1天开始随机接受氟康唑(400 mg /天口服或静脉注射)或两性霉素B(0.2 mg / kg /天静脉注射)直至中性粒细胞恢复至> 500 / microl。患者因药物相关毒性,侵袭性真菌感染或疑似真菌感染(定义为存在发烧> 38摄氏度且无广谱抗菌素阳性培养而从研究药物中退出)。用高剂量两性霉素B(0.5-0.7 mg / kg /天)治疗已证实或怀疑的真菌感染。在每个机构将患者随机分组,并对移植类型进行分层。该研究的主要终点是预防已记录的真菌感染。次要终点包括真菌定植,药物毒性,住院时间,发烧时间,中性粒细胞减少症的时间,高剂量两性霉素B的时间和总剂量以及出院的总生存期。从1992年7月到1994年10月,共有355名患者进入该试验,其中159名患者随机分配给两性霉素B和196名氟康唑。患者组在诊断,年龄,性别,先前的抗生素或抗真菌治疗,移植前使用皮质类固醇和中性粒细胞减少症的总持续时间方面具有可比性。两性霉素B的毒性显着高于氟康唑,尤其是在相关的同种异体移植中,其中19%的患者出现毒性,而氟康唑的接受者为0%(p <0.05)。所有患者中约有44%因推测的真菌感染而从预防中撤出。经证实的真菌感染分别发生在氟康唑和两性霉素治疗的患者中,分别为4.1%和7.5%。在分别接受氟康唑或两性霉素B的相关同种异体骨髓接受者中,分别有9.1%和14.3%的人证实了真菌感染,分别接受氟康唑或两性霉素B的自体骨髓接受者中分别有9.1%和5.6%(P> 0.05)。在这项前瞻性试验中,低剂量的两性霉素B预防与氟康唑预防一样有效,但氟康唑的耐受性明显更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号