...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Open versus laparoscopic resection of primary tumor for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: A large multicenter consecutive patients cohort study
【24h】

Open versus laparoscopic resection of primary tumor for incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: A large multicenter consecutive patients cohort study

机译:不可治愈的IV期大肠癌的原发性肿瘤的开放式与腹腔镜切除术:大型多中心连续患者队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate the hypothesis that laparoscopic primary tumor resection is safe and effective when compared with the open approach for colorectal cancer patients with incurable metastases. Background: There are only a few reports with small numbers of patients on laparoscopic tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent palliative primary tumor resection for stage IV colorectal cancer between January 2006 and December 2007 were collected retrospectively from 41 institutions. Short-and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic or open resection. Results: A total of 904 patients (laparoscopic group: 226, open group: 678) with a median age of 64 years (range: 22-95) were included in the analysis. Conversion was required in 28 patients (12.4%) and the most common reasons for conversion (23/28: 82%) were bulky or invasive tumors. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality in either group. The complication rate (NCI-CTCAE grade 2-4) after laparoscopic surgery (17%) was significantly lower than that after open surgery (24%) (P = 0.02), and the difference was greater (4% vs 12%; P < 0.001) when we limited the analysis to severe (grade 3) complications. The median length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (14 vs 17 days; P = 0.002). In univariate analysis, overall survival for the laparoscopic group was significantly better than that for open surgery (median survival time: 25.9 vs 22.3 months, P = 0.04), although no difference was apparent in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic primary tumor resection has advantages in the short term and no disadvantages in the long term. It is a reasonable treatment option for certain stage IV colorectal cancer patients with incurable disease.
机译:目的:探讨腹腔镜原发性肿瘤切除术与开放治疗结直肠癌合并顽固性转移患者安全有效的假说。背景:只有很少的报道报道了少数患者因腹腔镜手术切除了IV期大肠癌。方法:回顾性收集2006年1月至2007年12月间行姑息性原发肿瘤切除术治疗IV期大肠癌的连续患者的数据。比较了接受腹腔镜或开放性切除术的患者的短期和长期结局。结果:分析共纳入904例患者(腹腔镜组:226例,开放组:678例),中位年龄为64岁(范围:22-95岁)。 28例患者(12.4%)需要进行转化,最常见的转化原因(23/28:82%)是肿块或浸润性肿瘤。两组均无30天术后死亡率。腹腔镜手术后的并发症发生率(NCI-CTCAE 2-4级)(17%)显着低于开放手术后的并发症发生率(24%)(P = 0.02),且差异更大(4%比12%; P <0.001),因为我们将分析限于严重(3级)并发症。腹腔镜组术后住院的中位时间明显短于开放组(14天vs 17天; P = 0.002)。在单因素分析中,尽管在多因素分析中没有明显差异,但腹腔镜组的总生存率明显优于开放手术(中位生存时间:25.9 vs 22.3个月,P = 0.04)。结论:与开放手术相比,腹腔镜原发性肿瘤切除术在短期内具有优势,而长期而言则无缺点。对于某些无法治愈的IV期大肠癌患者,这是一种合理的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号