首页> 外文期刊>Brain and language >Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese
【24h】

Syntax does not necessarily precede semantics in sentence processing: ERP evidence from Chinese

机译:句法在句法处理中不一定要先于语义:来自中国的ERP证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two event-related potential experiments were conducted to examine whether the processing of syntactic category or syntactic subcategorization frame always needs to temporally precede semantic processing during the reading of Chinese sentences of object-subject-verb construction. The sentences contained (a) no anomalies, (b) semantic only anomalies, (c) syntactic category plus semantic anomalies, or (d) transitivity plus semantic anomalies. In both experiments, all three types of anomalies elicited a broad negativity between 300 and 500. ms. This negativity included an N400 effect, given its distribution. Moreover, syntactic category plus semantic anomalies elicited a P600 response, whereas the other two types of anomalies did not. The finding of N400 effects suggests that semantic integration can be attempted even when the processing of syntactic category or syntactic subcategorization frame is unsuccessful. Thus, syntactic processing is not a necessary prerequisite for the initiation of semantic integration in Chinese.
机译:进行了两个与事件相关的潜在实验,以检查句法范畴或句法子分类框架的处理在对象-宾语动词的汉语句子阅读过程中是否始终需要暂时在语义处理之前进行。这些句子包含(a)没有异常,(b)仅语义异常,(c)句法类别加语义异常,或(d)可及性加语义异常。在这两个实验中,所有这三种类型的异常都在300至500 ms之间引起了较大的负值。给定其分布,这种负面影响包括N400效应。此外,句法类别加上语义异常引发了P600响应,而其他两种类型的异常则没有。 N400效果的发现表明,即使句法类别或句法子分类框架的处理不成功,也可以尝试进行语义整合。因此,句法处理并不是启动汉语语义整合的必要前提。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号