首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >The costs and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation versus bone marrow transplantation in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.
【24h】

The costs and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation versus bone marrow transplantation in pediatric patients with acute leukemia.

机译:小儿急性白血病患者同种异体外周血干细胞移植与骨髓移植的费用和成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In a retrospective study, we evaluated the cost and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) (n = 30) compared with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (n = 110) in children with acute leukemia after 1 year of follow-up. Treatment success was defined as disease-free survival at 1 year posttransplantation. For patients at standard risk for disease, the treatment success rate was 57.1% for PBSCT recipients and 80.3% for BMT recipients (P = not significant [NS]). The average total cost per treatment success at 1 year in the standard-risk disease group was Dollars 512,294 for PBSCT recipients and Dollars 352,885 for BMT recipients (P = NS). For patients with high-risk disease, the treatment success rate was 18.8% for PBSCT recipients and 23.5% for BMT recipients (P = NS). The cumulative average cost was Dollars 457,078 in BMT recipients and Dollars 377,316 in PBSCT recipients (P = NS). Point estimates of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) indicate that in patients with standard-risk disease, allogeneic BMT had lower costs and greater effectiveness than PBSCT (ICER, -Dollars 687,108; 95% confidence interval [CI], Dollars 2.4 million to dominated). For patients with high-risk disease, BMT was more effective and more costly, and it had an ICER of Dollars 1.69 million (95% CI, Dollars 29.7 million to dominated) per additional treatment success. The comparative economic evaluation provides support for BMT in standard-risk patients, but much uncertainty precludes a clear advantage of either treatment option in patients with high-risk disease. More studies using larger and randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the long-term cost-effectiveness of each procedure.
机译:在一项回顾性研究中,我们评估了在1年后的急性白血病患儿中,同种异体外周血干细胞移植(PBSCT)(n = 30)与骨髓移植(BMT)(n = 110)的成本和成本效益。跟进。治疗成功定义为移植后1年的无病生存期。对于具有标准疾病风险的患者,PBSCT接受者的治疗成功率为57.1%,BMT接受者的治疗成功率为80.3%(P =不显着[NS])。标准风险疾病组在1年内每次治疗成功的平均总费用为PBSCT接受者512,294美元,BMT接受者352,885美元(P = NS)。对于高危疾病患者,PBSCT接受者的治疗成功率为18.8%,BMT接受者的治疗成功率为23.5%(P = NS)。 BMT接受者的累计平均费用为457,078美元,PBSCT接受者的累计平均费用为377,316美元(P = NS)。增量成本效益比(ICER)的点估计值表明,在标准风险患者中,同种异体BMT的费用更低,且有效性比PBSCT高(ICER,-美元687,108; 95%置信区间[CI],240万美元占主导地位)。对于高危疾病患者,BMT更有效,更昂贵,每成功治疗一次,其ICER为169万美元(95%CI,2970万美元占主导)。比较经济评估为标准风险患者的BMT提供了支持,但是很多不确定因素排除了高风险疾病患者中任一治疗方案的明显优势。需要使用更大的随机对照试验进行更多研究,以确认每种方法的长期成本效益。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号