首页> 外文期刊>Archives of sexual behavior >Preferences for Pink and Blue: The Development of Color Preferences as a Distinct Gender-Typed Behavior in Toddlers
【24h】

Preferences for Pink and Blue: The Development of Color Preferences as a Distinct Gender-Typed Behavior in Toddlers

机译:粉色和蓝色的首选项:颜色首选项的发展是幼儿中不同的性别类型行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many gender differences are thought to result from interactions between inborn factors and sociocognitive processes that occur after birth. There is controversy, however, over the causes of gender-typed preferences for the colors pink and blue, with some viewing these preferences as arising solely from sociocognitive processes of gender development. We evaluated preferences for gender-typed colors, and compared them to gender-typed toy and activity preferences in 126 toddlers on two occasions separated by 6-8 months (at Time 1, M = 29 months; range 20-40). Color preferences were assessed using color cards and neutral toys in gender-typed colors. Gender-typed toy and activity preferences were assessed using a parent-report questionnaire, the Preschool Activities Inventory. Color preferences were also assessed for the toddlers' parents using color cards. A gender difference in color preferences was present between 2 and 3 years of age and strengthened near the third birthday, at which time it was large (d > 1). In contrast to their parents, toddlers' gender-typed color preferences were stronger and unstable. Gender-typed color preferences also appeared to establish later and were less stable than gender-typed toy and activity preferences. Gender-typed color preferences were largely uncorrelated with gender-typed toy and activity preferences. These results suggest that the factors influencing gender-typed color preferences and gender-typed toy and activity preferences differ in some respects. Our findings suggest that sociocognitive influences and play with gender-typed toys that happen to be made in gender-typed colors contribute to toddlers' gender-typed color preferences.
机译:人们认为许多性别差异是由先天因素与出生后发生的社会认知过程之间的相互作用引起的。然而,对于粉红色和蓝色的性别类型偏好的原因存在争议,一些人认为这些偏好仅源于性别发展的社会认知过程。我们评估了对性别类型的颜色的偏爱,并将它们与126个幼儿中的性别类型的玩具和活动偏爱进行了比较,两次相隔6-8个月(在时间1,M = 29个月;范围为20-40)。使用色卡和中性玩具按性别分类评估颜色偏好。使用父母报告调查表“学前活动清单”评估性别类型的玩具和活动偏好。还使用色卡为幼儿的父母评估了颜色偏爱。在2至3岁之间存在颜色偏好上的性别差异,并且在三岁生日临近时这种差异有所增强(d> 1)。与父母相比,幼儿的性别偏好更强,更不稳定。性别类型的颜色偏好也似乎建立得较晚,并且不如性别类型的玩具和活动偏好稳定。性别类型的颜色偏好在很大程度上与性别类型的玩具和活动偏好无关。这些结果表明,影响性别类型的颜色偏好和性别类型的玩具和活动偏好的因素在某些方面有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,社会认知的影响以及碰巧以性别色制造的性别玩具的使用有助于幼儿的性别偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号