首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Question 1: Prednisoloneor dexamethasone for acute exacerbations of asthma: do they have similar ef ficacy in the management of exacerbations of childhood asthma?
【24h】

Question 1: Prednisoloneor dexamethasone for acute exacerbations of asthma: do they have similar ef ficacy in the management of exacerbations of childhood asthma?

机译:问题1:泼尼松龙或地塞米松治疗哮喘急性加重:他们在控制儿童哮喘加重中是否具有相似的功效?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

SCENARIO You are asked to see a 6-year-old child who has come into hospital with an acute exacerbation of asthma. She is able to talk in full sentences, however, her respirations are 40/min with audible wheeze, and you prescribe 10 puffs of salbutamol as initial management. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines recommend early use of steroids to decrease admission rate and length of stay,1 and you feel steroids would be of value for this child. However the mother of your patient explains her daughter hates taking any medications. You have read an article about dexamethasone being a shorter treatment course with better compliance and wonder if it has similar efficacy to prednisolone.QUESTION In children who have an acute exacerbation of asthma requiring steroids (population), does dexamethasone (intervention) have similar efficacy to prednisolone (comparison) in achieving decreased airway inflammation, decreased admission rates and length of hospital stay (outcome) ?SEARCH STRATEGY AND OUTCOME Medline (1996 to September week 2 2012) and Embase (1996 to 20 September 2012) were searched via Ovid on 21 September 2012 using the search terms ((dexamethasone AND prednisolone) or (dexamethasone AND prednisone)) AND ((acute asthma) OR (asthma exacerbation)). A total of 82 abstracts were reviewed, and six relevant studies were found: five papers were identified after review of abstracts, and a further paper from referenced citations. These are summarised in table 1.COMMENTARY Asthma is characterised by reversible airways obstruction, and exacerbations can be triggered by a variety of stimuli. Corticosteroids have been found to decrease airway inflammation for allergic and non-allergic causes.2 An umbrella review including Cochrane reviews highlighted reduced hospital admissions after adults with acute asthma were treated with early systemic corticosteroids.3 Corticosteroids were first shown to be effective in adults in 1986, and the first study supporting paedi-atric use was in 1990.4Prednisolone is the most commonly prescribed corticosteroid for asthma exacerbations, and stated to be the preferred choice Where does evidence based medicine go without evidence? I have recently been working with lots of folk who manage children with disability and long-term conditions, a massive group of heterogenously named conditions with sometimes similar and sometimes different problems. The teams working with them are passionate and committed and frequently want to use research.Then they go looking for it and frequently find nothing.Now—the experience of not finding evidence to help your question is not unique to disabilities—there are plenty of uncertainties in children's cancer, neonatology and diabetes. How can you move on without evidence in an evidence based way?We can take this forward in two ways. First, acknowledging the lack of really good evidence, we should use indirect, analogous and 'lower level' evidence.1 Responding to the clinical problem will be combining what data we do and do not have with discussions with the parents and child/young person.Second, we might use this to generate a clinical study question and seek folks to answer it. Evidence-based medicine is certainly not clinical research, but many really important clinical trials develop from the gaps identified by this sort of approach.Do not be upset when you find nothing—it's not that uncommon2 to go searching and find very little—but remember that evidence based medicine is possible, even without obvious evidence.
机译:场景您被要求去看一个因哮喘急性发作而入院的6岁儿童。她可以用完整的句子讲话,但是,她的呼吸频率为40 / min,有可闻的喘息声,因此您开处方10克沙丁胺醇作为初始治疗方法。英国胸科学会(BTS)指南建议及早使用类固醇激素以降低入院率和住院时间1,您会觉得类固醇激素对这个孩子很有价值。但是,您的患者的母亲解释说,她的女儿讨厌服用任何药物。您读过一篇有关地塞米松治疗周期较短,依从性更好的文章,并想知道它是否与泼尼松龙具有相似的疗效。问题对于患有哮喘急性发作且需要类固醇(人群)的儿童,地塞米松(干预)的疗效与在21岁时通过Ovid搜索了泼尼松龙(比较),以减少呼吸道炎症,降低入院率和住院时间(结果)?搜索策略和结果Medline(1996年至2012年9月2日)和Embase(1996年至2012年9月20日) 2012年9月使用搜索词((地塞米松和泼尼松龙)或(地塞米松和泼尼松)和AND((急性哮喘)或(哮喘发作))。总共对82篇摘要进行了审查,并发现了6篇相关研究:对摘要进行审查后,鉴定出5篇论文,并从参考文献中引用了另一篇论文。表1总结了这些内容。注释哮喘的特征是可逆性气道阻塞,各种刺激均可加剧哮喘发作。已发现皮质类固醇可减少因过敏和非过敏原因引起的气道炎症。2包括Cochrane在内的总括性综述均强调指出,早期哮喘患者接受早期全身性皮质类固醇激素治疗后住院率降低。3首次显示皮质类固醇对成人有效1986年,第一个支持儿科用药的研究是在1990年。4泼尼松龙是最常见的哮喘急性发作时处方的糖皮质激素,据称是首选药物。循证医学在哪里没有证据?我最近一直在与许多处理残疾和长期病患儿童的人合作,他们是一大批异类命名的病患,有时出现类似问题,有时出现不同问题。与他们一起工作的团队充满热情和投入,并经常想使用研究。然后,他们去寻找并经常发现任何东西。现在-找不到证据来帮助您解决问题的经验并非残疾所独有-存在很多不确定性患儿童的癌症,新生儿科和糖尿病。您如何在没有证据的情况下以基于证据的方式继续前进?我们可以通过两种方式来推动这一发展。首先,承认缺乏真正好的证据,我们应该使用间接的,类似的和“较低级别”的证据。1针对临床问题,将结合我们所做的和没有的数据与与父母以及孩子/年轻人的讨论相结合。第二,我们可能会用它来产生临床研究问题并寻求人们回答。循证医学当然不是临床研究,但是许多真正重要的临床试验都是通过这种方法发现的空白而发展的。当您一无所获时,不要感到沮丧-搜寻并发现很少的东西并不罕见-但记住即使没有明显的证据,循证医学也是可能的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号