首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >Electrocardiography is a poor screening test to detect left ventricular hypertrophy in children
【24h】

Electrocardiography is a poor screening test to detect left ventricular hypertrophy in children

机译:心电图检查对儿童左心室肥大的筛查效果较差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is clinically important because it can be predictive of adverse clinical outcome. However, the best method for detecting LVH in clinical practice is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate electrocardiography (ECG) compared with echocardiography (ECHO) as a screening test to detect LVH in a high risk population. Method: In a prospective, double-blinded, single centre analysis of a population of children with chronic kidney disease, LVH detected using standard 12-lead ECG (ECG-LVH) was compared with that detected with 2D-guided M-mode ECHO (ECHO-LVH). Two electrocardiographic methods (A and B) were used to diagnose ECG-LVH and compared with three different indexation methods to define ECHO-LVH. Results: 70 consecutively enrolled participants had 107 ECG and ECHO studies performed on the same day. The prevalence of ECHO-LVH ranged from 17% to 55% using different indexation methods. Increased R wave amplitude using recent age and gender specific voltage criteria (ECG method B) demonstrated the highest sensitivity (68-76%) and specificity (43-77%) for detecting ECHO-LVH. The negative predictive value (NPV) for R waves using ECG method B was 52.4% (range 40-68.6%). For all other ECG criteria, sensitivity did not exceed 13% irrespective of the ECG or ECHO method used. Conclusions: In children, the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram has low sensitivity and low NPV for detecting LVH. These findings are relevant for physiological LVH and should not be extrapolated to detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In clinical practice, ECHO alone should be used to exclude LVH.
机译:背景:检测左心室肥大(LVH)在临床上很重要,因为它可以预测不良的临床结果。然而,目前尚不清楚在临床实践中检测LVH的最佳方法。这项研究的目的是评估心电图(ECG)与超声心动图(ECHO)的比较,作为筛查测试以检测高危人群中的LVH。方法:在对慢性肾脏病患儿群体进行的前瞻性,双盲,单中心分析中,将使用标准12导联心电图(ECG-LVH)检测到的LVH与2D引导M型ECHO检测到的进行了比较( ECHO-LVH)。使用两种心电图方法(A和B)诊断ECG-LVH,并与三种不同的索引方法进行比较以定义ECHO-LVH。结果:70名连续入选的受试者在同一天进行了107次ECG和ECHO研究。使用不同的索引方法,ECHO-LVH的患病率在17%至55%之间。使用最近的年龄和性别特定电压标准(ECG方法B),增加的R波幅度证明了检测ECHO-LVH的最高灵敏度(68-76%)和特异性(43-77%)。使用ECG方法B的R波的阴性预测值(NPV)为52.4%(范围40-68.6%)。对于所有其他ECG标准,无论使用哪种ECG或ECHO方法,灵敏度均不超过13%。结论:对于儿童,标准的12导联心电图对LVH的检测灵敏度低且NPV低。这些发现与生理性LVH有关,不应推断为肥厚型心肌病的检测。在临床实践中,应单独使用ECHO排除LVH。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号