首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood >A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.
【24h】

A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.

机译:比较父母和教师的问卷调查结果,以及详细的眼科和心理评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are important tools used to gain information about health and level of function in different domains. AIMS AND METHODS: To determine the degree of agreement between questionnaires, administered to parents and teachers, and ophthalmic and psychological examinations in a cohort of 309 low birth weight children (<1701 g) at age 10-13 years. RESULTS: A total of 90.9% of cases showed agreement between the question on distance vision and clinical assessment, and agreement for the near vision question was 83%. However, the correlation on an individual basis was only fair (kappa = 0.46, distance vision) to poor (kappa = 0.2, near vision). The overall agreement for the questions on cognitive ability was better than the correlation, whereas the questions on reading and mathematical ability showed low agreement and low correlation. CONCLUSION: Questionnaire assessment of vision and cognitive ability is more suitable for studying the outcome of a large population than for identifying deficits in individuals.
机译:背景:调查表是用于获取有关不同领域的健康和功能水平信息的重要工具。目的和方法:确定在309名10-13岁低出生体重儿童(<1701 g)的队列中,向父母和老师进行问卷调查以及眼科和心理检查之间的一致性程度。结果:总共90.9%的病例表明远视力问题与临床评估之间的一致性,而近视力问题的一致性为83%。但是,个体之间的相关性仅差于(kappa = 0.46,远视)与差(kappa = 0.2,近视)相关。认知能力问题的总体一致性优于相关性,而阅读能力和数学能力问题的一致性较低。结论:对视觉和认知能力的问卷调查评估比识别个体缺陷更适合研究大量人群的结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号