...
首页> 外文期刊>Aquatic Toxicology >Pathology working group review of histopathologic specimens from three laboratory studies of diclofenac in trout.
【24h】

Pathology working group review of histopathologic specimens from three laboratory studies of diclofenac in trout.

机译:鳟鱼双氯芬酸的三项实验室研究对组织病理学标本进行病理学工作组审查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While the pathology peer review/pathology working group (PWG) model has long been used in mammalian toxicologic pathology to ensure the accuracy, consistency, and objectivity of histopathology data, application of this paradigm to ecotoxicological studies has thus far been limited. In the current project, the PWG approach was used to evaluate histopathologic sections of gills, liver, kidney, and/or intestines from three previously published studies of diclofenac in trout, among which there was substantial variation in the reported histopathologic findings. The main objectives of this review process were to investigate and potentially reconcile these interstudy differences, and based on the results, to establish an appropriate no observed effect concentration (NOEC). Following a complete examination of all histologic sections and original diagnoses by a single experienced fish pathologist (pathology peer review), a two-day PWG session was conducted to allow members of a four-person expert panel to determine the extent of treatment-related findings in each of the three trout studies. The PWG was performed according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Pesticide Regulation (PR) 94-5 (EPA Pesticide Regulation, 1994). In accordance with standard procedures, the PWG review was conducted by the non-voting chairperson in a manner intended to minimize bias, and thus during the evaluation, the four voting panelists were unaware of the treatment group status of individual fish and the original diagnoses associated with the histologic sections. Based on the results of this review, findings related to diclofenac exposure included minimal to slightly increased thickening of the gill filament tips in fish exposed to the highest concentration tested (1000 micro g/L), plus a previously undiagnosed finding, decreased hepatic glycogen, which also occurred at the 1000 micro g/L dose level. The panel found little evidence to support other reported effects of diclofenac in trout, and thus the overall NOEC was determined to be >320 micro g/L. By consensus, the PWG panel was able to identify diagnostic inconsistencies among and within the three prior studies; therefore this exercise demonstrated the value of the pathology peer review/PWG approach for assessing the reliability of histopathology results that may be used by regulatory agencies for risk assessment.
机译:虽然病理同行评审/病理工作组(PWG)模型长期以来一直用于哺乳动物毒理病理学研究中,以确保组织病理学数据的准确性,一致性和客观性,但迄今为止该范例在生态毒理学研究中的应用受到了限制。在当前项目中,PWG方法用于评估鳟鱼中双氯芬酸的三项先前发表的研究中g,肝,肾和/或肠道的组织病理切片,其中所报告的组织病理结果存在很大差异。审查过程的主要目标是调查并可能协调这些研究间的差异,并根据结果建立适当的无观察到的效应浓度(NOEC)。在由一位经验丰富的鱼类病理学家对所有组织学切片和原始诊断进行了全面检查之后(病理学同行评审),进行了为期两天的PWG会议,以允许四人专家小组的成员确定与治疗相关的发现的程度在三个鳟鱼研究中的每一个中。 PWG是根据美国环境保护局(US EPA)农药法规(PR)94-5(EPA农药法规,1994)执行的。根据标准程序,PWG审核由无表决权的主席以旨在最大程度减少偏差的方式进行,因此在评估过程中,四名投票小组成员未意识到单个鱼的治疗组状态以及相关的原始诊断。与组织学切片。根据本次审查的结果,与双氯芬酸接触有关的发现包括暴露于最高测试浓度(1000微克/升)的鱼的腮filament丝尖端的增厚最小或略有增加,再加上先前未诊断的发现,肝糖原降低,这也发生在1000 micro g / L剂量水平。专家组发现几乎没有证据支持双氯芬酸在鳟鱼中的其他作用,因此确定的总NOEC为> 320 micro g / L。通过协商一致,PWG小组能够确定三项先前研究之间和之内的诊断不一致之处;因此,本练习证明了病理学同行评审/ PWG方法在评估组织病理学结果的可靠性方面的价值,该结果可被监管机构用于风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号