首页> 外文期刊>Applied Animal Behaviour Science >Social learning in dog training: The effectiveness of the Do as I do method compared to shaping/clicker training
【24h】

Social learning in dog training: The effectiveness of the Do as I do method compared to shaping/clicker training

机译:狗训练中的社交学习:“按需做”方法与塑形/答题器训练相比的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dog training methods traditionally rely on individual learning (mainly operant conditioning). Yet dogs are adept in acquiring information socially and are able to imitate humans. Dogs' predisposition to learn socially has been recently introduced in dog training with the Do as I do method. With this method dogs first learn to match their behaviour to a small set of actions displayed by a human demonstrator on command 'Do it!' and later are able to generalise this rule to use it to learn novel actions. In the present study, we compare the effectiveness of the Do as I do method with that of shaping/clicker training, a method that relies on individual learning, for teaching dogs two different kinds of actions: a body movement and an object-related action. As measures of effectiveness, we use the number of dog-trainer pairs experienced with either method, that succeed in obtaining five performances in a row of the predetermined action within 30 min and the latency to the fifth performance. Additionally, we assess the effect of these training methods on dogs' memory of the trained action and its verbal cue in different contexts. Our results show that the Do as I do method is more effective than shaping/clicker training to teach dogs object-related actions within a relatively short time and suggest that this method might be also applied for training body-movements. Importantly, the use of social learning enhances dogs' memory and generalisation of the learned action and its verbal cue. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:传统上,狗的训练方法依赖于个人学习(主要是操作者调节)。然而,狗善于社交获取信息,并且能够模仿人类。最近,在狗训练中采用“按我做”方法介绍了狗对社交学习的倾向。通过这种方法,狗首先学会了将他们的行为与人类示威者根据命令“ Do it!”显示的一小部分动作进行匹配。后来又能够推广该规则以用于学习新颖的动作。在本研究中,我们将“按原样做”方法与依靠个体学习的塑形/答题器训练的有效性进行比较,该方法用于教狗两种不同的动作:身体运动和与物体有关的动作。作为有效性的衡量标准,我们使用了每种方法经历过的训犬师对的数量,它们成功地在30分钟内连续执行了预定动作中的五次表演,并获得了第五次表演的延迟。此外,我们评估了这些训练方法对狗在不同情况下记忆训练后的动作及其言语提示的影响。我们的研究结果表明,“做就做”方法比塑形/答题器训练在相对短的时间内教狗与对象有关的动作更有效,并且表明该方法也可用于训练身体动作。重要的是,社交学习的使用增强了狗的记忆力,并增强了所学动作及其言语提示的概括性。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号