首页> 外文期刊>Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Comparison of the prognostic value of a panel of tissue tumor markers and established clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer.
【24h】

Comparison of the prognostic value of a panel of tissue tumor markers and established clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer.

机译:一组组织肿瘤标志物和已建立的临床病理因素对胃癌患者的预后价值的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess if the addition of a panel of tumor markers to established clinicopathological factors could improve the accuracy of 5-year outcome prediction in gastric cancer. The studied markers were chosen to represent different aspects of tumor biology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The expression of syndecan-1, tenascin-C, tumor-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI), p53, p21 and bcl-2 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry informalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from 337 patients with gastric cancer. In addition, the DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction (SPF) were assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The loss of epithelial syndecan-1, strong stromal syndecan-1, the loss of stromal tenascin-C, the loss of tumor tissue TATI, high p53 and high p21 expression, aneuploidy and high (> or =7.6%) SPF were all associated with an unfavorable prognosis in univariate survival analysis. In multivariate survival analysis, p53 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.58; confidence interval (CI) 95% 1.16-2.16), p21 (HR 1.67; CI 95% 1.09-2.56) and DNA ploidy (HR 1.50; CI 95% 1.10-2.05) were independent prognostic factors, in addition to penetration depth (pT), lymph node status (pN), age at diagnosis and estimated radicality of surgery. The difference in prognostic accuracy between a base model with pT, pN, age and radicality of surgery (area under the curve (AUC) 0.898; CI 95% 0.86-0.94) and an extended model including p53, p21 and DNA ploidy (AUC 0.900; CI 95% 0.86-0.94) was not statistically significant (p=0.85). CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, p53 and p21 expression, as well as DNA ploidy, are independent prognostic factors in addition to standard clinicopathological factors. However, the established indicators of the extent of disease show an impressively high accuracy in 5-year outcome prediction and adding the examined tumor markers to the base model does not significantly improve the prognostic accuracy.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估在既定的临床病理因素中添加一组肿瘤标志物是否可以提高胃癌5年预后的准确性。选择研究标记以代表肿瘤生物学的不同方面。病人和方法:采用免疫组织化学法固定在石蜡包埋的337例胃癌患者中,分析了syndecan-1,腱糖蛋白C,肿瘤相关胰蛋白酶抑制剂(TATI),p53,p21和bcl-2的表达。另外,通过流式细胞术评估DNA倍性和S期分数(SPF)。结果:上皮syndecan-1的丧失,强基质syndecan-1的丧失,基质腱生蛋白C的丧失,肿瘤组织TATI的丧失,p53和p21的高表达,非整倍性和高(≥7.6%)的SPF所有这些均与单因素生存分析中不良的预后相关。在多因素生存分析中,p53(危险比(HR)1.58;置信区间(CI)95%1.16-2.16),p21(HR 1.67; CI 95%1.09-2.56)和DNA倍性(HR 1.50; CI 95%1.10-除了穿透深度(pT),淋巴结状态(pN),诊断时的年龄和估计的手术根治性,2.05)是独立的预后因素。具有pT,pN,年龄和手术彻底性的基础模型(曲线下面积(AUC)0.898; CI 95%0.86-0.94)与包括p53,p21和DNA倍性的扩展模型(AUC 0.900)之间的预后准确性差异; CI 95%0.86-0.94)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.85)。结论:在胃癌中,除标准的临床病理因素外,p53和p21的表达以及DNA倍性是独立的预后因素。但是,已建立的疾病程度指标在5年结局预测中显示出惊人的高准确性,将检查的肿瘤标志物添加到基本模型中并不能显着提高预后准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号