首页> 外文期刊>Applied Psychological Measurement >Recovery of Graded Response Model Parameters: A Comparison of Marginal Maximum Likelihood and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation
【24h】

Recovery of Graded Response Model Parameters: A Comparison of Marginal Maximum Likelihood and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation

机译:分级响应模型参数的恢复:边际最大似然和马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗估计的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods enable a fully Bayesian approach to parameter estimation of item response models. In this simulation study, the authors compared the recovery of graded response model parameters using marginal maximum likelihood (MML) and Gibbs sampling (MCMC) under various latent trait distributions, test lengths, and sample sizes. Sample size and test length explained the largest amount of variance in item and person parameter estimates, respectively. There was little difference in item parameter recovery between MML and MCMC in samples with 300 or more respondents. MCMC recovered some item threshold parameters better in samples with 75 or 150 respondents. Bias in threshold parameter estimates depended on the generating value and the type of threshold. Person parameters were comparable between MCMC and MML/expected a posteriori for all test lengths.
机译:马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)方法使项目响应模型的参数估计可以采用完全贝叶斯方法。在此模拟研究中,作者比较了在各种潜在性状分布,测试长度和样本量下使用边际最大似然(MML)和吉布斯抽样(MCMC)的分级响应模型参数的恢复情况。样本数量和测试长度分别解释了项目和人员参数估计中最大的差异。在300名或更多受访者的样本中,MML和MCMC之间的项目参数恢复几乎没有差异。 MCMC在75个或150个受访者的样本中更好地恢复了某些项目阈值参数。阈值参数估计中的偏差取决于生成值和阈值的类型。人员参数在MCMC和MML之间可比/预期所有测试长度的后验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号