首页> 外文期刊>Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics >System thermodynamic performance comparison of CO_2-EGS and water-EGS systems
【24h】

System thermodynamic performance comparison of CO_2-EGS and water-EGS systems

机译:CO_2-EGS和水-EGS系统的系统热力学性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

CO_2 may be a better heat transmission fluid than water for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). The advantages and disadvantages of these two kinds of EGS are the focus of this study. The water and CO_2-EGS system models including simple subsurface heat transfer and flow models and a surface energy conversion system model were designed based on the reservoir grade and the ambient temperatures. The results indicate that the operating parameters including the injection pressure, turbine outlet pressure and reservoir stimulated area should be optimized to match the actual CO_2-EGS conditions. CO_2-EGS produce more power than water-EGS for reservoirs with low recoverable thermal energies due to less irreversible losses compared to ORC or flash cycles for water-EGS. However, high resistance losses caused by high mass flow rates degrade the CO_2-EGS performance; thus, the water-EGS has better performance than CO_2-EGS for larger energy content reservoirs.
机译:对于增强地热系统(EGS),CO_2可能是比水更好的传热流体。这两种EGS的优缺点是本研究的重点。根据油藏等级和环境温度设计了水和CO_2-EGS系统模型,包括简单的地下传热和流动模型以及表面能转换系统模型。结果表明,应优化操作参数,包括喷射压力,涡轮出口压力和储层受压面积,以匹配实际的CO_2-EGS条件。对于可回收热能较低的储层,CO_2-EGS比水-EGS产生的功率更大,这是因为与水-EGS的ORC或闪蒸循环相比,不可逆损失较小。但是,由于高质量流量导致的高电阻损耗会降低CO_2-EGS性能。因此,对于较大能量的储层,水-EGS的性能优于CO_2-EGS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号