首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >The influence of supporting the Oxylog instrument on estimated maximal aerobic capacity during a step test and heart rate in a lifting test
【24h】

The influence of supporting the Oxylog instrument on estimated maximal aerobic capacity during a step test and heart rate in a lifting test

机译:支持Oxylog仪器对步测过程中估计的最大有氧能力和举重测试中的心率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated the influence of wearing, an Oxylog mask and heart rate monitor while the Oxylog instrument was supported in a stand versus that of wearing the Oxylog mask, heart rate monitor, and the Oxylog instrument, on oxygen consumption (VO{sub}2) and heart rate response during a graduated submaximal step test protocol. Also, the predicted maximal aerobic capacities (VO{sub}2max) produced by the two graduated step tests were compared. In addition, differences in the working heart rates in a submaximal lifting test were analyzed in two lifting tests, one with the participant wearing the Oxylog mask, heart rate monitor, and Oxylog instrument and the other required the participant to only wear a heart monitor. Seventeen experienced male manual materials handlers participated in the study, and each treatment was seen by each participant in a randomized Latin Square design. Results from the two investigations indicate that there was no significant difference in the estimated maximal oxygen consumption (p=0.1384) and no significant difference in the heart rate between the two lift tests. The analysis did show that the 4th stage (participants reaching their physiological limits) of the step tests indicated a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0259 for oxygen consumption, and p=0.0465 for heart rate).
机译:这项研究调查了在支架上支撑Oxylog仪器时,佩戴Oxylog面罩和心率监测器与佩戴Oxylog面罩,心率监测器和Oxylog仪器对佩戴者的氧气消耗量(VO {sub} 2 )和分级次最大步阶测试规程期间的心率响应。此外,比较了两个分级步骤测试产生的预计最大有氧运动能力(VO {sub} 2max)。此外,在两次提升测试中分析了次最大提升测试中的工作心率差异,一种测试参与者佩戴Oxylog面罩,心率监测器和Oxylog仪器,另一项要求参与者仅佩戴心脏监测器。十七名经验丰富的男性手工材料处理人员参加了研究,每位参与者在随机的Latin Square设计中均看到了每种处理方法。两次调查的结果表明,两次抬高试验之间的最大摄氧量估计值无显着差异(p = 0.1384),心率也无显着差异。分析确实表明,阶跃测试的第4阶段(参与者达到其生理极限)显示出统计学上的显着差异(耗氧量p = 0.0259,心律速率p = 0.0465)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号