...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Automobile seat comfort prediction: statistical model vs. artificial neural network
【24h】

Automobile seat comfort prediction: statistical model vs. artificial neural network

机译:汽车座椅舒适度预测:统计模型与人工神经网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The current automobile seat comfort development process, which is executed in a trial and error fashion, is expensive and outdated. The prevailing thought is that process improvements are contingent upon the implementation of empirical/prediction models. In this context, seat-interface pressure measures, anthropometric characteristics, demographic information, and perceptions of seat appearance were related to an overall comfort index (which was a single score derived from a previously published 10-item survey with demonstrated levels of reliability and validity) using two distinct modeling approaches-stepwise, linear regression and artificial neural network. The purpose of this paper was to compare and contrast the resulting models. While both models could be used to adequately predict subjective perceptions of comfort, the neural network was deemed superior because it produced higher r{sup}2 values (0,8.32 vs. 0.71.3) and lower average error values (1.192 vs. 1.779).
机译:以试错法执行的当前的汽车座椅舒适性开发过程昂贵且过时。普遍认为,过程改进取决于经验/预测模型的实施。在这种情况下,座椅界面压力测量,人体测量学特征,人口统计学信息和座椅外观感知与整体舒适度指数(这是先前发布的10个项目的调查得出的单分,其信度和效度水平已得到证实) )使用两种不同的建模方法-逐步,线性回归和人工神经网络。本文的目的是比较和对比结果模型。虽然两个模型都可以用来充分预测舒适度的主观感觉,但是神经网络被认为是优越的,因为它产生了更高的r {sup} 2值(0,8.32 vs. 0.71.3)和更低的平均误差值(1.192 vs. 1.779)。 )。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号