首页> 外文期刊>Behavioural Brain Research: An International Journal >Behavioral sensitization to dopaminergic inhibitory and stimulatory effects induced by low vs. high dose apomorphine treatments: an unconventional dose and response reversal sensitization challenge test reveals sensitization mechanisms.
【24h】

Behavioral sensitization to dopaminergic inhibitory and stimulatory effects induced by low vs. high dose apomorphine treatments: an unconventional dose and response reversal sensitization challenge test reveals sensitization mechanisms.

机译:低剂量与高剂量阿扑吗啡治疗对多巴胺能抑制和刺激作用的行为敏化:非常规剂量和反应逆转敏化挑战试验揭示了敏化机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Low dose apomorphine treatments preferentially activate dopamine autoreceptors and inhibit dopamine neurons as well as behavior. In contrast, high doses of apomorphine induce locomotor stimulation by activating dopamine postsynaptic receptors. We compared the effects of low (0.05 mg/kg) vs. high (2.0 mg/kg) repeated apomorphine treatments (5) using paired/unpaired protocols upon the development of Pavlovian conditioned drug responses and upon drug sensitization effects. In addition to the conventional challenge test for sensitization, we also conducted a treatment reversal sensitization test in which low dose groups received the high dose treatment and vice versa. The high dose treatment produced the expected Pavlovian conditioned locomotor stimulant response as well as a sensitization effect in the high dose challenge test; but in the low dose challenge test, the effect was desensitization. The low dose apomorphine regimen induced an inhibitory sensitization effect in the low dose challenge test. In the high dose reversal challenge test, there was a sensitization effect to the locomotor stimulant effect. The low dose apomorphine treatments, however, did not produce a Pavlovian conditioned locomotor inhibitory effect. Surprisingly, the dose reversal challenge test revealed context-independent as well as context-specific sensitization/desensitization effects. These findings demonstrate that Pavlovian drug conditioned effects and drug sensitization effects are independent phenomena and that sensitization effects are not response specific. Moreover, context-specific vs. context-independent sensitization effects were protocol dependent but not drug dose dependent.
机译:低剂量阿扑吗啡治疗可优先激活多巴胺自身受体并抑制多巴胺神经元和行为。相反,高剂量的阿扑吗啡通过激活多巴胺突触后受体来诱导运动刺激。我们比较了使用配对/未配对方案的低(0.05 mg / kg)与高(2.0 mg / kg)重复阿扑吗啡治疗(5)对巴甫洛夫条件药物反应的发展以及药物致敏作用的影响。除了常规的致敏性激发试验外,我们还进行了治疗逆转敏化试验,其中低剂量组接受高剂量治疗,反之亦然。高剂量治疗在高剂量激发试验中产生了预期的巴甫洛夫病条件性运动刺激反应以及敏化作用。但在低剂量激发试验中,效果是脱敏。低剂量阿扑吗啡方案在低剂量激发试验中诱导了抑制致敏作用。在高剂量逆转激发试验中,对运动刺激作用有敏化作用。然而,低剂量阿扑吗啡治疗未产生巴甫洛夫条件调节的运动抑制作用。出乎意料的是,剂量逆转激发试验显示了上下文无关的以及上下文特定的致敏/脱敏作用。这些发现表明,巴甫洛夫药物条件作用和药物致敏作用是独立的现象,致敏作用不是应答特异性的。此外,特定于情境与独立于情境的致敏作用是方案依赖性的,而不是药物剂量依赖性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号