...
【24h】

Is experimental research passe.

机译:是实验研究合格。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In perusing the contents of this issue, I discovered that, once again, the majority of the papers are not experimental. There are several qualitative studies-of teachers' attitudes to student feedback, reflective learning for continuing education, residents' perceptions of outpatient teaching, and assessment expert's view of the framework for assessments, cohort study looking at predictors of motivation for medicine, a survey of teachers' perceptions of student feedback, a correlational study of concurrent validity of a personality test, a review paper on the issue of whether Asian students are rote learners, and 3 randomized trials. One looked at the use of simulation in addition to a PBL session for management of respiratory and cardiac distress, another at web-based learning, and a third examined the effect of testing on retention of CPR skills. So of the 11 original studies, 3 were experimental. I suppose I should
机译:在仔细阅读此问题的内容时,我再次发现,大多数论文都不是实验性的。有几种定性研究,包括教师对学生反馈的态度,反思性学习以进行继续教育,居民对门诊教学的看法以及评估专家对评估框架的看法,队列研究中寻找医学动机的预测因素,教师对学生反馈的看法,人格测验的并发有效性的相关研究,有关亚洲学生是否是死记硬背的问题的评论论文,以及3项随机试验。除了在PBL会话中管理呼吸和心脏窘迫之外,一个人还研究了模拟的使用,基于Web的学习中,另一个人研究了模拟,第三人研究了测试对CPR技能保留的影响。因此,在11项原始研究中,有3项是实验性的。我想我应该

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号