首页> 外文期刊>Appetite >Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians
【24h】

Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians

机译:食用肉的价值,态度和频率。预测澳大利亚人减少肉食的饮食

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reduced consumption of meat, particularly red meat, is associated with numerous health benefits. While past research has examined demographic and cognitive correlates of meat-related diet identity and meat consumption behaviour, the predictive influence of personal values on meat-consumption attitudes and behaviour, as well as gender differences therein, has not been explicitly examined, nor has past research focusing on 'meat' generally addressed 'white meat' and 'fish/seafood' as distinct categories of interest. Two hundred and two Australians (59.9% female, 39.1% male, 1% unknown), aged 18 to 91 years (M=31.42, SD =16.18), completed an online questionnaire including the Schwartz Values Survey, and measures of diet identity, attitude towards reduced consumption of each of red meat, white meat, and fish/seafood, as well as self-reported estimates of frequency of consumption of each meat type. Results showed that higher valuing of Universalism predicted more positive attitudes towards reducing, and less frequent consumption of, each of red meat, white meat, and fish/seafood, while higher Power predicted less positive attitudes towards reducing, and more frequent consumption of, these meats. Higher Security predicted less positive attitudes towards reducing, and more frequent consumption, of white meat and fish/seafood, while Conformity produced this latter effect for fish/seafood only. Despite men valuing Power more highly than women, women valuing Universalism more highly than men, and men eating red meat more frequently than women, gender was not a significant moderator of the value attitude behaviour mediations described, suggesting that gender's effects on meat consumption may not be robust once entered into a multivariate model of MRD attitudes and behaviour. Results support past findings associating Universalism, Power, and Security values with meat-eating preferences, and extend these findings by articulating how these values relate specifically to different types of meat. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:减少肉类(尤其是红肉)的消耗会带来许多健康益处。尽管过去的研究检查了与肉相关的饮食特性和肉食用行为的人口统计和认知相关性,但个人价值对肉食用态度和行为以及其中的性别差异的预测影响尚未得到明确检查,过去也没有专注于“肉”的研究通常将“白肉”和“鱼/海鲜”作为不同的兴趣类别。 202岁的澳大利亚人(59.9%的女性,39.1%的男性,1%的未知数)年龄在18至91岁之间(M = 31.42,SD = 16.18),已完成了在线问卷调查,包括施瓦茨价值观调查以及饮食认同的测量,对减少每种红肉,白肉和鱼类/海鲜的消费的态度,以及自我报告的每种肉类消费频率的估计。结果表明,对普遍主义的重视程度越高,则对减少红肉,白肉和鱼/海鲜的消费的积极态度就越强;而对“强权主义”的态度越高,对减少这些食物的积极态度就越低;而对红肉,白肉和鱼类/海鲜的消费就越频繁。肉。更高的安全性预示着减少减少和更频繁地食用白肉和鱼类/海鲜的积极态度较少,而合格性仅对鱼类/海鲜产生了后者的影响。尽管男人比女人对权力的评价更高,女人对普遍主义的评价高于男人,男人吃红肉的频率高于女人,但性别并不是所描述的价值态度行为中介的重要调节剂,这表明性别对肉食的影响可能不大。一旦进入MRD态度和行为的多元模型,就会变得健壮。结果支持过去的发现,将普遍性,权力和安全性价值观与吃肉偏好相关联,并通过阐明这些价值观与不同类型的肉类具体相关的方式来扩展这些发现。官方版权(C)2014,由Elsevier Ltd.发行。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号