首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Surgical Pathology >Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Angiomyoadenomatous Tumor Two Variants of a Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genetic Distinct Entity of Renal Cell Carcinoma
【24h】

Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Angiomyoadenomatous Tumor Two Variants of a Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genetic Distinct Entity of Renal Cell Carcinoma

机译:透明细胞乳头状肾细胞癌和肾血管肌腺瘤性肿瘤肾细胞癌的形态,免疫组织化学和遗传不同实体的两个变体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (ccpRCC) and renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor (RAT) share morphologic similarities with clear cell (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC). It is a matter of controversy whether their morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features allow the definition of a separate renal carcinoma entity. The aim of our project was to investigate specific renal immunohistochemical biomarkers involved in the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway and mutations in the VHL gene to clarify the relationship between ccpRCC and RAT. We investigated 28 ccpRCC and 9 RAT samples by immunohistochemistry using 25 markers. VHL gene mutations and allele losses were investigated by Sanger sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for a subset of the patients. No tumor recurrence or tumor-related death was observed in any of the patients. Immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses led to the reclassification of 3 tumors as ccRCC and TFE3 translocation carcinomas. The immunohistochemical profile of ccpRCC and RAT samples was very similar but not identical, differing from both ccRCC and pRCC. Especially, the parafibromin and hKIM-1 expression exhibited differences in ccpRCC/RAT compared with ccRCC and pRCC. Genetic analysis revealed VHL mutations in 2/27 (7%) and 1/7 (14%) ccpRCC and RAT samples, respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis disclosed a 3p loss in 2/20 (10%) ccpRCC samples. ccpRCC and RAT have a specific morphologic and immunohistochemical profile, but they share similarities with the more aggressive renal tumors. On the basis of our results, we regard ccpRCC/RAT as a distinct entity of RCCs.
机译:透明细胞乳头状肾细胞癌(ccpRCC)和肾血管平滑肌腺瘤瘤(RAT)与透明细胞(ccRCC)和乳头状RCC(pRCC)具有相似的形态。它们的形态,免疫表型和分子特征是否允许定义一个单独的肾癌实体,这是一个有争议的问题。我们项目的目的是研究参与缺氧诱导因子途径的特定肾脏免疫组织化学生物标记物以及VHL基因的突变,以阐明ccpRCC与RAT之间的关系。我们使用25种标记物通过免疫组织化学研究了28个ccpRCC和9个RAT样品。通过Sanger测序和荧光原位杂交研究了VHL基因突变和等位基因丢失。获得了部分患者的临床随访数据。在任何患者中均未观察到肿瘤复发或与肿瘤相关的死亡。免疫组织化学和分子分析导致3种肿瘤被重新分类为ccRCC和TFE3易位癌。 ccpRCC和RAT样品的免疫组织化学特征与ccRCC和pRCC非常相似但不完全相同。特别地,与ccRCC和pRCC相比,副纤蛋白和hKIM-1表达在ccpRCC / RAT中表现出差异。遗传分析显示ccpRCC和RAT样本分别有2/27(7%)和1/7(14%)的VHL突变。荧光原位杂交分析揭示了2/20(10%)ccpRCC样品的3p损失。 ccpRCC和RAT具有特定的形态和免疫组化谱,但它们与更具侵略性的肾肿瘤具有相似之处。根据我们的结果,我们认为ccpRCC / RAT是RCC的独特实体。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号