首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Surgical Pathology >Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with nodal low-grade serous carcinoma
【24h】

Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with nodal low-grade serous carcinoma

机译:淋巴结性低度浆液性癌低恶性卵巢浆液性肿瘤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Serous tumor of low malignant potential (SLMP) and low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) are part of one biological continuum, whereby SLMP can transform into LGSC. It has been suggested that some nodal SLMPs arise from nodal endosalpingiosis and evolve independently in lymph nodes (rather than being related to the ovarian primary). In this article, we present the clinicopathologic features of 5 cases of nodal LGSC presenting in association with ovarian SLMP. Clinical information was obtained from the patients' charts. Pathologic features of the nodal LGSC, including lymph node location, size of and extent of involvement of tumor, architectural pattern, degree of cytologic atypia, mitotic index, and presence of psammoma bodies, were recorded. Ovarian SLMPs were noted for laterality, size, presence of surface excrescences, microinvasion, and micropapillary/cribriform pattern and for presence of autoimplants, invasive, and noninvasive implants. The distribution of any lymph nodes with nodal endosalpingiosis or SLMPs was also recorded. Patients ranged in age from 28 to 68 years (median, 32 y). In 4 cases, the diagnosis of nodal LGSC occurred at a different time from that of the ovarian SLMPs, ranging from 7 months before to 5 months after the ovarian tumor diagnosis. Nodal LGSC was detected in supraclavicular (2 cases), cervical, intramammary, and periaortic lymph nodes (1 case each). The gross lymph node size ranged from 0.9 to 2.5 cm (median, 1.3 cm). The tumors either replaced the entire lymph node or were found diffusely involving subcapsular and medullary sinuses or lymph node cortices. Tumor cells showed typical cytologic features of LGSC and no mitotic activity. In 2 cases, however, focal pleomorphic cells and 1 mitosis per 10 HPF were noted. Psammoma bodies were identified in all cases. When immunohistochemical analysis was performed, all tumors exhibited a profile in keeping with Müllerian origin. All ovarian tumors were well sampled and ranged in size from 0.1 to 13 cm (median, 2.5 cm). No ovarian SLMP tumors showed the micropapillary/cribriform pattern, whereas only focal microinvasion was detected in 3 cases. Four tumors had surface excrescences. All cases had noninvasive implants, and a single case also had invasive implants. Lymph node dissection was performed in 2 cases, revealing extensive endosalpingiosis in pelvic and periaortic lymph nodes and SLMP in pelvic lymph nodes. In 1 additional case, a single lymph node was sampled, revealing a nodal SLMP. Clinical follow-up ranged from 2 to 14 years (median, 9 y). All patients received postoperative chemotherapy. None of the patients experienced recurrence in pelvic or abdominal soft tissue. Two patients are free of disease. However, 2 patients, one with cervical and another with supraclavicular nodal LGSC, had recurrences at these sites and subsequently succumbed to metastatic disease. Both of these patients had pelvic and periaortic nodal SLMP and extensive nodal endosalpingiosis. Another patient, originally with supraclavicular LGSC, developed pelvic and abdominal lymphadenopathy, and is currently alive with disease. For the first time, we present a case series of patients with ovarian SLMP who, despite any evidence of LGSC in the pelvis or any pelvic recurrences, developed extrapelvic/extra-abdominal nodal LGSC. These patients also had endosalpingiosis and SLMP in pelvic and periaortic lymph nodes, suggesting that SLMP/LGSC tumors in lymph nodes may arise independently of the ovarian primary, progress along their own timeline, and undergo metastatic spread. Therefore, in patients with ovarian SLMP and extensive pelvic/periaortic nodal endosalpingiosis and/or SLMP, examination and follow-up of extrapelvic lymph nodes are warranted, even if the ovarian tumor lacks high-risk features of recurrence.
机译:低恶性浆液性肿瘤(SLMP)和低度浆液性癌(LGSC)是一种生物连续体的一部分,SLMP可以转化为LGSC。已经有人提出,某些结节性SLMPs是由结节性内胚层增生引起的,并在淋巴结中独立发展(而不是与卵巢原发性疾病相关)。在本文中,我们介绍了5例与卵巢SLMP相关的淋巴结转移性淋巴结转移的临床病理特征。临床信息是从患者图表中获得的。记录了结节LGSC的病理学特征,包括淋巴结位置,肿瘤的大小和受累程度,结构模式,细胞学非典型性程度,有丝分裂指数和肺腺瘤体的存在。注意到卵巢SLMPs具有侧向性,大小,表面钝化,微浸润和微乳头/筛状图案的存在,以及自体植入物,有创和无创植入物的存在。还记录了淋巴结内镜检查或淋巴结清扫术的分布。患者年龄为28至68岁(中位数为32岁)。在4例中,淋巴结转移性LGSC的诊断发生时间与卵巢SLMP的诊断时间不同,诊断时间从卵巢肿瘤诊断的7个月到诊断卵巢癌的5个月。在锁骨上淋巴结(2例),子宫颈,乳腺内和腹主动脉旁淋巴结(各1例)中检测到淋巴结干细胞。淋巴结总大小范围为0.9到2.5厘米(中位数为1.3厘米)。肿瘤替代了整个淋巴结,或被发现弥漫性累及囊下和髓窦或淋巴结皮质。肿瘤细胞表现出LGSC的典型细胞学特征,无有丝分裂活性。然而,在2例中,每10 HPF出现局灶性多形细胞和1个有丝分裂。在所有情况下均发现了肺炎的尸体。进行免疫组织化学分析时,所有肿瘤均表现出与缪勒氏起源相同的特征。所有卵巢肿瘤均取样良好,大小范围为0.1至13厘米(中位数为2.5厘米)。没有卵巢SLMP肿瘤表现出微乳头/筛状图案,而在3例中仅检测到局灶性微浸润。四个肿瘤具有表面脱落。所有病例均具有非侵入性植入物,单个病例也具有侵入性植入物。淋巴结清扫术2例,发现盆腔和腹主动脉淋巴结广泛内镜检查和盆腔淋巴结SLMP。在另外一种情况下,采样了一个淋巴结,显示出淋巴结转移。临床随访时间为2到14年(中位数9年)。所有患者均接受术后化疗。没有患者出现骨盆或腹部软组织复发。两名患者无病。但是,有2例患者,其中1例患有宫颈癌,另一例患有锁骨上淋巴结转移,在这些部位复发,随后死于转移性疾病。这两名患者均患有盆腔和腹主动脉结节性SLMP和广泛性结节内镜迷走病。另一例最初患有锁骨上LGSC的患者发展为骨盆和腹部淋巴结肿大,目前还活着。首次,我们介绍了一系列卵巢SLMP患者病例,这些患者尽管有骨盆LGSC证据或任何盆腔复发,但仍发展为盆外/腹外淋巴结LGSC。这些患者在盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结中也有内吞,内膜增生和SLMP,提示淋巴结中的SLMP / LGSC肿瘤可能独立于卵巢原发灶而发生,沿其自身时间表发展,并发生转移扩散。因此,对于卵巢SLMP伴有广泛盆腔/腹主动脉淋巴结内膜异位症和/或SLMP的患者,即使卵巢肿瘤缺乏复发的高危特征,也必须检查和随访盆腔外淋巴结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号