...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Biomechanical evaluation of 3 arthroscopic self-cinching stitches for shoulder arthroscopy: the lasso-loop, lasso-mattress, and double-cinch stitches.
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of 3 arthroscopic self-cinching stitches for shoulder arthroscopy: the lasso-loop, lasso-mattress, and double-cinch stitches.

机译:三种用于肩关节镜的关节镜自动收紧针的生物力学评估:套索环,套索床垫和双收紧针。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The tissue-suture interface remains the most common site of failure in rotator cuff repairs. Improving stitch strengths may lead to lower failure rates. PURPOSE: To compare biomechanical properties of 3 self-cinching stitches to the simple, mattress, modified Mason-Allen, and massive cuff stitches. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: In sum, 336 sheep infraspinatus tendon grafts were randomized among 7 stitches. Each graft was cyclically loaded on a mechanical testing system from 5 to 30 N for 20 cycles and then loaded to failure. A mixed-effect multivariate regression model was used to test significance of suture type on cyclic elongation, peak-to-peak displacement, and ultimate load. Estimated means and standard deviations are reported from the regression model. RESULTS: Ultimate load for the simple stitch was significantly lower than for the other stitches. The lasso-loop and mattress stitch demonstrated similar ultimate loads. The double-cinch had a higher ultimate load than the lasso-loop or mattress stitch, although it was significantly weaker than the modified Mason-Allen, lasso-mattress, and massive cuff. The lasso-mattress had a superior ultimate load to the modified Mason-Allen and a similar ultimate load to the massive cuff stitch. One significant difference was found in cyclic elongation (1.42 mm for the simple to 1.80 mm for the double-cinch), and the cinching mechanism accounted for 0.2-mm higher elongation. CONCLUSION: Self-cinching stitches lead to superior tissue-holding strength at the tissue-suture interface when compared with equivalent non-self-cinching stitches. Self-cinching stitches have greater elongation values. How these differences in cyclic elongation clinically influence gap formation at the repair site is unknown. The greater displacement seen in the self-cinching stitches is a potential concern because minimal gap formation is desired for a strong repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lasso-loop stitch is a stronger alternative to a simple stitch, and the double-cinch and lasso-mattress stitches are stronger alternatives to a mattress stitch.
机译:背景:组织缝合界面仍然是肩袖修复中最常见的失败部位。改善针迹强度可能会降低故障率。目的:比较3种自紧式针迹与简单的床垫,改良的Mason-Allen针刺法和大袖口针迹的生物力学性能。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:总共336针中随机分为336针绵羊羊下肌腱移植。将每个移植物从5到30 N循环加载到机械测试系统上20个循环,然后加载失败。使用混合效应多元回归模型测试缝线类型对循环伸长率,峰-峰位移和极限载荷的显着性。从回归模型报告估计的均值和标准差。结果:简单针的极限载荷明显低于其他针。套索环和床垫针迹显示出相似的极限载荷。双束带的最终负荷比套索环或床垫针迹高,尽管它比改良的梅森-艾伦,套索床垫和厚实的袖口要弱得多。套索床垫具有比改良的梅森-艾伦(Mason-Allen)更高的极限载荷,并且与大型袖口针迹具有相似的极限载荷。发现循环伸长率有一个显着差异(简单的伸长为1.42 mm,双束带的为1.80 mm),而收紧机制则使伸长率增加了0.2 mm。结论:与等效的非自紧针相比,自紧针在组织缝合界面处具有更高的组织固定强度。自紧式针迹的伸长率值更大。这些循环伸长率的差异在临床上如何影响修复部位的间隙形成尚不清楚。在自动收紧针迹中看到的更大位移是一个潜在的问题,因为需要最小的缝隙形成以进行强力修复。临床相关性:套索套针是简单针的更强替代品,双肚带和套索床垫的针是床垫针的更强替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号