...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Sports Medicine >Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
【24h】

Knee rotational laxity in a randomized comparison of single- versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

机译:单束和双束前交叉韧带重建的随机比较中膝关节旋转松弛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: While single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces anterior-posterior laxity, studies have demonstrated residual rotational instability. Improved pivot-shift results have been shown with the double-bundle graft; however, no study has compared rotational laxity outcome of these surgical techniques in vivo under quantified, isolated torsional loading. HYPOTHESIS: The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee exhibits greater rotational laxity than the contralateral uninjured knee. The double-bundle reconstruction restores rotational joint stability to a greater extent than single-bundle surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Rotational laxity of 32 patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament injury was assessed in both knees at full extension and 30 degrees of flexion using a magnetic resonance imaging-compatible torsional loading device. Patients were randomly allocated either a single- or double-bundle reconstruction and reassessed 5 months after surgery. RESULTS: The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees demonstrated greater laxity to internal rotational torque in the extended position, but not in the 30 degrees flexed position. No significant differences in rotational laxity were found between single- and double-bundle reconstructions. In extension, excessive internal rotational laxity of injured compared with contralateral knees was reduced by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The single-bundle reconstruction did not affect internal rotation compared with contralateral or preoperative groups. In response to internal rotational torque in the flexed knee position, the double-bundle reconstruction reduced laxity to 10.8 degrees from the pre-operative value of 15.3 degrees (P = .058); postoperative rotation was also significantly less than the contralateral laxity of 16.4 degrees (P = .022). CONCLUSION: The ruptured anterior cruciate ligament resulted in increased internal rotational laxity only in the extended position. The single-bundle reconstruction did not affect rotational restraint compared with contralateral or preoperative groups. The double-bundle procedure significantly reduced internal laxity in the flexed position when compared with normal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As the anterior cruciate ligament is not the primary restraint to rotation, its contribution to joint stability is limited under isolated torsional load. While the double-bundle graft demonstrates superior rotational constraint, this may be excessive for isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture.
机译:背景:虽然单束前交叉韧带重建可减少前后松弛,但研究表明残留的旋转不稳定性。双束移植物已显示出更好的枢轴移位结果。然而,尚无研究在定量,孤立的扭转载荷下比较这些手术技术在体内的旋转松弛结果。假设:前交叉韧带不足的膝盖比对侧未受伤的膝盖表现出更大的旋转松弛。与单束手术相比,双束重建可更大程度地恢复旋转关节的稳定性。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:使用磁共振成像兼容的扭力加载装置评估了32例单侧前交叉韧带损伤患者的旋转松弛度,分析了双膝在完全伸展和屈曲30度时的情况。患者被随机分配为单束或双束重建,并在术后5个月重新评估。结果:前交叉韧带不足的膝盖在伸展位置表现出更大的内部旋转扭矩松弛,但在30度屈曲位置则没有。单束和双束重建之间的旋转松弛度没有显着差异。此外,通过前交叉韧带重建,与对侧膝盖相比,受伤的内部过度旋转松弛得以减轻。与对侧或术前组相比,单束重建不影响内旋。响应屈膝位置中的内部旋转扭矩,双束重建将松弛度从术前的15.3度降低到10.8度(P = .058)。术后旋转也明显小于对侧松驰度16.4度(P = .022)。结论:前十字韧带破裂仅在伸展位置导致内部旋转松弛增加。与对侧或术前组相比,单束重建不影响旋转约束。与正常情况相比,双束手术可显着降低屈曲位置的内部松弛。临床相关性:由于前交叉韧带不是旋转的主要限制因素,因此在孤立的扭转载荷下,其对关节稳定性的作用受到限制。尽管双束移植物显示出优越的旋转约束力,但对于孤立的前交叉韧带破裂而言可能过大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号