...
首页> 外文期刊>Anthropod-plant interactions >Different relationships between galling and non-galling herbivore richness and plant species richness: a meta-analysis.
【24h】

Different relationships between galling and non-galling herbivore richness and plant species richness: a meta-analysis.

机译:gall虫和非-虫草食动物的丰富度与植物物种丰富度之间的不同关系:荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The plant richness hypothesis (PRH) is used to explain herbivorous insect richness based on the number of plant species, predicting a positive relationship. However, the influence of plant richness on insect distribution can become stronger with greater levels of specialization of herbivores. In this meta-analysis, I tested whether there is any difference in the correlation force recorded between studies that investigated endophagous versus exophagous herbivores, and galling versus non-galling guilds, in order to determine whether more specialized groups have a stronger relationship. Furthermore, I calculated whether effect sizes were homogeneous between galling studies carried out at local and regional scales, and between tropical and temperate regions. A total of 52 correlations were analyzed between plant species richness and herbivore species richness, with 18 correlations derived from galling herbivores and 34 from non-galling herbivores. The effect sizes were significant and positive in all studies, being higher for endophages than for exophages, and for galling than for non-galling studies. These results provide evidence that groups of insects with a higher level of host specialization and specificity (e.g., endophagous and galling) exhibit a greater dependence on plant richness. There was no difference in effect sizes for galling studies between the local and regional level or between tropical and temperate groups. Despite the large variability found for galling studies, effect sizes were consistent independently of climatic region and latitudinal variation. These results suggest that the PRH for galling insects can be generalized to most ecosystem and vegetation types.
机译:植物丰富度假说(PRH)用于根据植物种类的数量来解释草食性昆虫的丰富度,并预测其呈正相关。然而,随着草食动物专业化程度的提高,植物丰富度对昆虫分布的影响会增强。在这项荟萃分析中,我测试了研究吞噬性与外食性草食动物的研究与咬伤性与非咬伤性公会的研究之间记录的相关力是否存在任何差异,以确定是否更专业的群体之间存在更强的联系。此外,我计算了在局部和区域范围内进行的擦伤研究之间以及热带和温带地区之间的效应大小是否均一。总共分析了52种植物物种丰富度与草食动物物种丰富度之间的相关性,其中有18种相关性来自没食性草食动物,而34种来自无害食草动物。在所有研究中,效应大小均显着且为阳性,对于内生噬菌体而言,其效果要高于对外噬菌体,对于擦伤而言,其效果要高于非擦伤性研究。这些结果提供了证据,表明具有更高水平的寄主特化和特异性的昆虫群体(例如,吞噬和咬伤)表现出对植物丰富度的更大依赖性。局部和区域水平之间或热带和温带人群之间的擦伤研究效果大小没有差异。尽管对于擦伤研究发现较大的可变性,但效果大小是一致的,与气候区域和纬度变化无关。这些结果表明,gall虫的PRH可以推广到大多数生态系统和植被类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号