...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of family medicine >Primary care, economic barriers to health care, and use of colorectal cancer screening tests among Medicare enrollees over time.
【24h】

Primary care, economic barriers to health care, and use of colorectal cancer screening tests among Medicare enrollees over time.

机译:随着时间的推移,Medicare参加者中的初级保健,医疗保健的经济障碍以及结直肠癌筛查测试的使用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of primary care and economic barriers to health care on CRC testing relative to the 2001 Medicare expansion of screening coverage. METHODS: Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data were use to study community-dwelling enrollees aged 65 to 80 years, free of renal disease and CRC, and who participated in the survey in 2000 (n = 8,330), 2003 (n = 7,889), or 2005 (n = 7,614). Three outcomes were examined: colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy within 5 years (recent endoscopy), endoscopy more than 5 years previously, and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within 2 years. RESULTS: Endoscopy use increased and FOBT use decreased during the 6-year period, with no significant independent differences between those receiving care from primary care physicians and those receiving care from other physicians. Beneficiaries without a usual place of health care were the least likely to undergo CRC testing, and that gap widened with time: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.39) for FOBT, and AOR = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.27-0.46) for endoscopy in 2000 compared with AOR = 0.18 (95% CI, 0.11-0.30) for FOBT and AOR = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.17-0.30) for endoscopy in 2005. Disparities in use of recent endoscopy by type of health insurance coverage in both 2000 and 2005 were greater for enrollees with a high school education or higher than they were for less-educated enrollees. There were no statistically significant differences by delayed care due to cost after adjustment for health insurance. CONCLUSION: Despite expanding coverage for screening, complex CRC screening disparities persisted based on differences in the usual place and cost of health care, type of health insurance coverage, and level of education.
机译:目的:大肠癌(CRC)筛查仍未得到充分利用。这项研究的目的是检验相对于2001年Medicare筛查覆盖面的扩大,初级保健和医疗保健的经济障碍对CRC检测的影响。方法:Medicare当前受益人调查数据用于研究年龄在65至80岁,没有肾脏疾病和CRC的社区居民登记者,这些参与者在2000年(n = 8,330),2003年(n = 7,889)参加了调查,或者2005(n = 7,614)。检查了三个结局:5年以内的结肠镜检查/乙状结肠镜检查(最近的内窥镜检查),5年前的内镜检查和2年以内的粪便潜血试验(FOBT)。结果:在6年内,内镜检查的使用增加了,而FOBT的使用减少了,从初级保健医生那里接受治疗的人与从其他医生那里接受治疗的人之间没有显着的独立差异。没有常规卫生保健场所的受益人接受CRC检测的可能性最小,并且该差距随时间而扩大:FOBT和AOR的调整后优势比(AOR)= 0.27(95%置信区间[CI],0.19-0.39) = 2000年内窥镜检查为0.35(95%CI,0.27-0.46),而2005年内窥镜检查的AOR = 0.18(95%CI,0.11-0.30),2005年内窥镜检查的AOR = 0.22(95%CI,0.17-0.30)。受过高等教育的高中生或高学历者在2000年和2005年按健康保险覆盖率对近期内窥镜的使用率要高于受教育程度较低的人。在调整健康保险后,因费用而导致的延误护理在统计学上无显着差异。结论:尽管扩大了筛查的覆盖范围,但由于通常的医疗保健地点和费用,医疗保险的类型以及教育水平的差异,复杂的CRC筛查差异仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号